Literature DB >> 26419662

Vocal response inhibition is enhanced by anodal tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex.

Leidy J Castro-Meneses1,2, Blake W Johnson3, Paul F Sowman3,4.   

Abstract

Stopping outright (reactive inhibition) and slowing down (proactive inhibition) are types of response inhibition which have mainly been investigated in the manual effector system. This study compared reactive inhibition across manual and vocal effector systems, examined the effects of excitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (anodal tDCS) over the right prefrontal cortex (right-PFC) and looked at the relationship between reactive and proactive inhibition. We hypothesised (1) that vocal reactive inhibition would be less effective than manual reactive inhibition as evidenced by longer stop signal reaction times; (2) that anodal tDCS would enhance both vocal and manual reactive inhibitions and (3) that proactive and reactive inhibitions would be positively related. We tested 14 participants over two sessions (one session with anodal tDCS and one session with sham stimulation) and applied stimulation protocol in the middle of the session, i.e. only during the second of three phases. We used a stop signal task across two stop conditions: relevant and irrelevant stop conditions in which stopping was required or ignored, respectively. We found that reactive inhibition was faster during and immediately after anodal tDCS relative to sham. We also found that greater level of proactive inhibition enhanced reactive inhibition (indexed by shorter stop signal reaction times). These results support the hypothesis that the right-PFC is part of a core network for reactive inhibition and supports previous contention that proactive inhibition is possibly modulated via preactivating the reactive inhibition network.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anodal tDCS; Reactive inhibition and proactive inhibition; Response inhibition; Stop signal task; Vocal inhibition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26419662     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4452-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Intracortical modulation of cortical-bulbar responses for the masseter muscle.

Authors:  Enzo Ortu; Franca Deriu; Antonio Suppa; Elena Giaconi; Eusebio Tolu; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances memory-guided responses in a visuospatial working memory task.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giglia; Filippo Brighina; Silvia Rizzo; Angela Puma; Serena Indovino; Simona Maccora; Roberta Baschi; Giuseppe Cosentino; Brigida Fierro
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

5.  Motor inhibition in trichotillomania and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Antje Bohne; Cary R Savage; Thilo Deckersbach; Nancy J Keuthen; Sabine Wilhelm
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Response inhibition and impulsivity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter G Enticott; James R P Ogloff; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Mark G Stokes; Tracy R Henderson; Hugh Garavan; Ian H Robertson; Adam P Morris; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Ian C Gould; Therese English; Hugh Garavan; Elizabeth McNaught; Marc Kamke; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Hugh Garavan; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Modulating presence and impulsiveness by external stimulation of the brain.

Authors:  Gian Beeli; Gianclaudio Casutt; Thomas Baumgartner; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  7 in total

1.  Event-related fields evoked by vocal response inhibition: a comparison of younger and older adults.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Investigating the sex-dependent effects of prefrontal cortex stimulation on response execution and inhibition.

Authors:  Daniel J Fehring; Ranshikha Samandra; Zakia Z Haque; Shapour Jaberzadeh; Marcello Rosa; Farshad A Mansouri
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.027

3.  Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study.

Authors:  Etienne Sallard; Michael Mouthon; Michael De Pretto; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  tDCS over the inferior frontal gyri and visual cortices did not improve response inhibition.

Authors:  Christina Thunberg; Mari S Messel; Liisa Raud; René J Huster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Your verbal questions beginning with 'what' will rapidly deactivate the left prefrontal cortex of listeners.

Authors:  Hirotaka Iwaki; Masaki Sonoda; Shin-Ichiro Osawa; Brian H Silverstein; Takumi Mitsuhashi; Kazushi Ukishiro; Yutaro Takayama; Toshimune Kambara; Kazuo Kakinuma; Kyoko Suzuki; Teiji Tominaga; Nobukazu Nakasato; Masaki Iwasaki; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production.

Authors:  Ruben D Vromans; Suzanne R Jongman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stop signals delay synchrony more for finger tapping than vocalization: a dual modality study of rhythmic synchronization in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.