Literature DB >> 19571025

Cost analysis of multiplex PCR testing for diagnosing respiratory virus infections.

James B Mahony1, Gord Blackhouse, Jesse Babwah, Marek Smieja, Sonya Buracond, Sylvia Chong, William Ciccotelli, Tim O'Shea, Daifallah Alnakhli, May Griffiths-Turner, Ron Goeree.   

Abstract

We performed a cost analysis study using decision tree modeling to determine whether the use of multiplex PCR testing for respiratory viruses (xTAG RVP test) is a more or less costly strategy than the status quo testing methods used for the diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in pediatric patients. The decision tree model was constructed by using four testing strategies for respiratory virus detection, viz., direct fluorescent-antibody staining (DFA) alone, DFA plus shell vial culture (SVC), the xTAG RVP test alone, or DFA plus the xTAG RVP test. A review of the charts of 661 pediatric patients was used to determine the length of hospital stay, the number of days in isolation, antibiotic usage, and all other medical procedures performed. The cost of hospitalization by diagnostic status was determined on the basis of the average cost per patient and the number of patients in each arm of the decision tree. The cost per case was the highest for DFA plus SVC at $3,914 (in Canadian dollars), and the lowest was for the xTAG RVP test alone at $3,623, while the costs of DFA alone ($3,911) and DFA plus RVP ($3,849) were intermediate. When all four diagnostic strategies were compared, the least costly strategy was the xTAG RVP test alone when the prevalence of infection was 11% or higher and DFA alone when the prevalence was under 11%. These data indicate a savings of $291 per case investigated if the strategy of using the xTAG RVP test alone was used to replace the status quo test of DFA plus SVC, resulting in a savings of $529,620 per year in direct costs for the four Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, hospitals on the basis of the testing of specimens from 1,820 pediatric inpatients. We conclude that the use of the xTAG RVP test is the least costly strategy for the diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in children and would generate a significant savings for hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19571025      PMCID: PMC2738055          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00556-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of the NOW Influenza A & B, NOW Flu A, NOW Flu B, and Directigen Flu A+B assays, and immunofluorescence with viral culture for the detection of influenza A and B viruses.

Authors:  Marita Smit; Kirsten A Beynon; David R Murdoch; Lance C Jennings
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients.

Authors:  P C Woo; S S Chiu; W H Seto; M Peiris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study.

Authors:  J Barenfanger; C Drake; N Leon; T Mueller; T Troutt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; J Sellors; K Luinstra; S Chong; S Castriciano; J B Mahony
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 5.  Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods.

Authors:  James B Mahony
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Detection of respiratory viruses using non-molecular based methods.

Authors:  Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Comparison of viral isolation and multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR for confirmation of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus detection by antigen immunoassays.

Authors:  R S Liao; L L Tomalty; A Majury; D E Zoutman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel with in-house nucleic acid amplification tests for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections.

Authors:  Kanti Pabbaraju; Kara L Tokaryk; Sallene Wong; Julie D Fox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Impact of rapid detection of viral and atypical bacterial pathogens by real-time polymerase chain reaction for patients with lower respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  Jan Jelrik Oosterheert; Anton M van Loon; Rob Schuurman; Andy I M Hoepelman; Eelko Hak; Steven Thijsen; George Nossent; Margriet M E Schneider; Willem M N Hustinx; Marc J M Bonten
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  xTAG RVP assay: analytical and clinical performance.

Authors:  Nancy Krunic; Thomas D Yager; David Himsworth; Frank Merante; Sevana Yaghoubian; Richard Janeczko
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.168

View more
  66 in total

1.  Comparison of the Idaho Technology FilmArray system to real-time PCR for detection of respiratory pathogens in children.

Authors:  Virginia M Pierce; Michael Elkan; Marilyn Leet; Karin L McGowan; Richard L Hodinka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the Luminex Respiratory Virus Panel fast assay with in-house real-time PCR for respiratory viral infection diagnosis.

Authors:  Naomi J Gadsby; Alison Hardie; Eric C J Claas; Kate E Templeton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Enhanced viral etiological diagnosis of respiratory system infection outbreaks by use of a multitarget nucleic acid amplification assay.

Authors:  Sallene Wong; Kanti Pabbaraju; Bonita E Lee; Julie D Fox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A lean laboratory: operational simplicity and cost effectiveness of the Luminex xTAG™ respiratory viral panel.

Authors:  Nicola E Dundas; Mandolin S Ziadie; Paula A Revell; Evangeline Brock; Midori Mitui; N Kristine Leos; Beverly B Rogers
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 5.  Multiplex polymerase chain reaction tests for detection of pathogens associated with gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhang; Scott Morrison; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 1.935

6.  Comparison of the GenMark Diagnostics eSensor respiratory viral panel to real-time PCR for detection of respiratory viruses in children.

Authors:  Virginia M Pierce; Richard L Hodinka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of the Biofire FilmArray RP, Genmark eSensor RVP, Luminex xTAG RVPv1, and Luminex xTAG RVP fast multiplex assays for detection of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Elena B Popowitch; Stacey S O'Neill; Melissa B Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Optimal Timing of Repeat Multiplex Molecular Testing for Respiratory Viruses.

Authors:  Yamini Mandelia; Gary W Procop; Sandra S Richter; Sarah Worley; Wei Liu; Frank Esper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Paper-based pump-free magnetophoresis.

Authors:  Zachary D Call; Cody S Carrell; Ilhoon Jang; Brian J Geiss; David S Dandy; Charles S Henry
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 10.  Syndromic Panel-Based Testing in Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Poornima Ramanan; Alexandra L Bryson; Matthew J Binnicker; Bobbi S Pritt; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.