Literature DB >> 10921934

Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study.

J Barenfanger1, C Drake, N Leon, T Mueller, T Troutt.   

Abstract

To assess the expected benefits of rapid reporting of respiratory viruses, we compared patients whose samples were processed using standard techniques such as enzyme immunoassays, shell vial assays, and culture tube assays (year 1) to patients whose samples were processed with the same standard techniques in addition to immunofluorescent testing (FA) directly on cytocentrifuged samples (year 2). The cytospin FA screened for influenza A and B viruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza viruses 1 to 3, and adenovirus (DAKO Diagnostics Ltd.). The specificity of the cytospin FA for all viruses was 100%. The sensitivities for influenza A virus and RSV were 90 and 98%, respectively, but the sensitivities for influenza B virus and adenovirus were unacceptable (14.3 and 0%, respectively). However, since the former viruses account for >85% of our isolates from clinical specimens, the cytospin FA is an excellent screening test since the positive result was available within hours. The mean turnaround time for all positive viruses was 4.5 days in year 1 and 0.9 day in year 2 (P = 0.001). This rapid reporting resulted in physicians having access to information sooner, enabling more appropriate treatment. The mean length of stay in the hospital for inpatients with respiratory viral isolates was 10.6 days for year 1 versus 5.3 days for year 2. Mean variable costs for these patients was $7,893 in year 1 and $2,177 in year 2. After subtracting reagent costs and technological time, the savings in variable costs was $144,332/year. Summarizing, the cytospin FA markedly decreased turnaround time and was associated with decreased mortality, length of stay, and costs and with better antibiotic stewardship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10921934      PMCID: PMC87120     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  4 in total

1.  Use of fluorescent-antibody staining of cytocentrifuge-prepared smears in combination with cell culture for direct detection of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  K M Doing; M A Jerkofsky; E G Dow; J A Jellison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J Barenfanger; C Drake; G Kacich
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients.

Authors:  P C Woo; S S Chiu; W H Seto; M Peiris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification.

Authors:  G V Doern; R Vautour; M Gaudet; B Levy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total
  118 in total

1.  Rapid laboratory diagnostics during the winter respiratory virus season.

Authors:  Steven M Lipson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the Denka-Seiken INFLU A.B-Quick and BD Directigen Flu A+B kits with direct fluorescent-antibody staining and shell vial culture methods for rapid detection of influenza viruses.

Authors:  James J Dunn; Chris Gordon; Christy Kelley; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Full impact of laboratory information system requires direct use by clinical staff: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joaquín A Blaya; Sonya Shin; Carmen Contreras; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Luis Asencios; Jihoon Kim; Pablo Rodriguez; Peter Cegielski; Hamish S F Fraser
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Controlling testing volume for respiratory viruses using machine learning and text mining.

Authors:  Mark V Mai; Michael Krauthammer
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

6.  Evaluation of the Hexaplex assay for detection of respiratory viruses in children.

Authors:  S C Kehl; K J Henrickson; W Hua; J Fan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the one-step multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR ProFlu-1 assay for detection of influenza A and influenza B viruses and respiratory syncytial viruses in children.

Authors:  Jérôme Legoff; Rachid Kara; Florence Moulin; Ali Si-Mohamed; Anne Krivine; Laurent Bélec; Pierre Lebon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Rapid multiplex PCR assay to identify respiratory viral pathogens: moving forward diagnosing the common cold.

Authors:  Clifton P Layman; Sarah M Gordon; Diane U Elegino-Steffens; Willie Agee; Jason Barnhill; Gunther Hsue
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-09

10.  Evaluation of three immunoassay kits for rapid detection of influenza virus A and B.

Authors:  Adriana Weinberg; Miranda L Walker
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.