Literature DB >> 19568315

Monolingual and Bilingual Recognition of Regular and Irregular English Verbs: Sensitivity to Form Similarity Varies with First Language Experience.

Dana M Basnight-Brown1, Lang Chen, Shu Hua, Aleksandar Kostić, Laurie Beth Feldman.   

Abstract

We used a cross-modal priming procedure to explore the processing of irregular and regular English verb forms in both monolinguals and bilinguals (Serbian-English, Chinese-English). Materials included irregular nested stem (drawn-DRAW), irregular change stem (ran-RUN), and regular past tense-present tense verb pairs that were either low (guided-GUIDE) or high (pushed-PUSH) in resonance, a measure of semantic richness. Overall, semantic richness of irregular verbs (nested and irregular change) and of regular verbs (high and low resonance) was matched. Native speakers of English revealed comparable facilitation across regularity and greater facilitation for nested than change stem irregulars. Like native speakers, Serbian, but not Chinese bilinguals matched for proficiency, showed facilitation due to form overlap between irregular past and present tense forms with a nested stem. Unlike native speakers, neither group showed reliable facilitation to stem change irregulars. Results demonstrate the influence of first language on inflectional processing in a second language.

Year:  2007        PMID: 19568315      PMCID: PMC2702761          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  20 in total

1.  The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network.

Authors:  J G Rueckl; M Raveh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?

Authors:  L B Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing.

Authors:  Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín; Aleksandar Kostić; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-11

4.  Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Authors:  Minna Lehtonen; Helge Niska; Erling Wande; Jussi Niemi; Matti Laine
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-03

5.  Rules of language.

Authors:  S Pinker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Semantic facilitation and translation priming effects in Chinese-English bilinguals.

Authors:  H C Chen; M L Ng
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

9.  The effect of first written language on the acquisition of English literacy.

Authors:  A Holm; B Dodd
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-05

10.  Orthographic processing of polysyllabic words by native and nonnative English speakers.

Authors:  Marcus Taft
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  10 in total

1.  Multiple Translations in Bilingual Memory: Processing Differences Across Concrete, Abstract, and Emotion Words.

Authors:  Dana M Basnight-Brown; Jeanette Altarriba
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

2.  L1 and L2 Spoken Word Processing: Evidence from Divided Attention Paradigm.

Authors:  Saeedeh Shafiee Nahrkhalaji; Ahmad Reza Lotfi; Mansour Koosha
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

3.  Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Laurie Beth Feldman; Aleksandar Kostić; Dana M Basnight-Brown; Dušica Filipović Durđević; Matthew John Pastizzo
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2010-01-01

4.  Sensitivity to Regular and Irregular Past Tense Morphology in Native Speakers and Second Language Learners of English: Evidence From Intermediate-to-Advanced Persian Speakers of L2 English.

Authors:  Ebrahim Safaie
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-07-21

5.  Morphological Decomposition in L2 Arabic: A Masked Priming Study.

Authors:  Rebecca Foote; Mousa Qasem; Emma Trentman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-04

6.  An Event-Related Potential Study of Cross-modal Morphological and Phonological Priming.

Authors:  Timothy Justus; Jennifer Yang; Jary Larsen; Paul de Mornay Davies; Diane Swick
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.710

7.  Sub- and supralexical information in early phases of lexical access.

Authors:  Juhani Järvikivi; Pirita Pyykkönen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-25

8.  L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs.

Authors:  Sophie De Grauwe; Kristin Lemhöfer; Roel M Willems; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The impact of cognateness of word bases and suffixes on morpho-orthographic processing: A masked priming study with intermediate and high-proficiency Portuguese-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Montserrat Comesaña; Pauline Bertin; Helena Oliveira; Ana Paula Soares; Juan Andrés Hernández-Cabrera; Séverine Casalis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing.

Authors:  Laura Anna Ciaccio; Gunnar Jacob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.