Literature DB >> 19559221

Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection.

David T Cooke1, Giant C Lin, Christine L Lau, Linda Zhang, Ming-Sing Si, Julia Lee, Andrew C Chang, Allan Pickens, Mark B Orringer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transhiatal esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is a common approach in patients requiring esophagectomy. Factors for developing cervical esophagogastric anastomosis leaks (CEGAL), their presentation, and the value of a routine postoperative screening barium swallow in detecting CEGALs and other complications were analyzed.
METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study used medical records and an esophagectomy database to assess results in 1,133 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy and a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, 241 for benign disease and 892 for cancer, between January 1996 and December 2006.
RESULTS: Esophagectomy patients who experienced CEGALs included 127 (14.2%) with cancer and 23 (9.5%) with benign disease. Logistic regression analysis identified increasing number of preoperative comorbidities (p < 0.001), active smoking history (p = 0.044), and postoperative arrhythmia (p = 0.002) as risk factors for CEGALs, and a side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis compared with a manually sewn one as protective (p < 0.001). For cancer patients, higher pathologic stage disease (p = 0.050) was a risk factor for CEGALs. For patients with benign disease, a higher number of prior esophagogastric operations (p = 0.007) is a risk factor for CEGALs. Of the 90.7% of CEGALs that occurred on or before postoperative day 10, cervical wound drainage (63.3%) was the most common presenting symptom. Screening barium swallow identified postoperative complications and influenced outcome in 39 patients (3.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher number of preoperative comorbidities, advanced pathologic stage, postoperative arrhythmia, an increased number of prior esophagogastric surgeries, and active smoking history are risk factors for developing CEGAL, and a side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is protective. Screening barium swallow identifies few postoperative complications, but provides quality control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19559221     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  33 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.

Authors:  Sundeep Singh Saluja; Sukanta Ray; Sujoy Pal; Sumit Sanyal; Nikhil Agrawal; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Peush Sahni; Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Albert-Lembert versus hybrid-layered suture in hand sewn end-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal squamous cell carcinoma resection.

Authors:  Fan Feng; Li Sun; Guanghui Xu; Liu Hong; Jianjun Yang; Lei Cai; Guocai Li; Man Guo; Xiao Lian; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with prior antireflux or hiatal hernia surgery.

Authors:  Andrew C Chang; Julia S Lee; Konrad T Sawicki; Allan Pickens; Mark B Orringer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Hybrid trans-thoracic esophagectomy with side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Fernando A Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Planned delay of oral intake after esophagectomy reduces the cervical anastomotic leak rate and hospital length of stay.

Authors:  John S Bolton; William C Conway; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Deng; Quan-Xing Liu; Dong Zhou; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A non-randomized retrospective observational study on the subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: is it feasible in high-risk patients?

Authors:  Jae Ho Chung; Sung Ho Lee; Eunjue Yi; Jae Seung Jung; Jung Wook Han; Tae Sik Kim; Ho Sung Son; Kwang Taik Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  A guideline for perioperative smoking cessation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 9.  Tracheal compression by the gastric tube in esophageal cancer with ankylosing spondylitis and an analysis of the mediastinal condition in 84 cases of esophagectomy: report a case.

Authors:  Norimasa Ikeda; Yasunori Akutsu; Kiyohiko Shuto; Takayuki Tohma; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Tubular stomach or whole stomach for esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal approach: a comparative clinical study on anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Y-S Shu; C Sun; W-P Shi; H-C Shi; S-C Lu; K Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.