Literature DB >> 26716030

Albert-Lembert versus hybrid-layered suture in hand sewn end-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal squamous cell carcinoma resection.

Fan Feng1, Li Sun1, Guanghui Xu1, Liu Hong1, Jianjun Yang1, Lei Cai1, Guocai Li1, Man Guo1, Xiao Lian1, Hongwei Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hand sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (CEGA) is regarded as preferred technique by surgeons after esophagectomy. However, considering the anastomotic leakage and stricture, the optimal technique for performing this anastomosis is still under debate.
METHODS: Between November 2010 and September 2012, 230 patients who underwent esophagectomy with hand sewn end-to-end (ETE) CEGA for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were analyzed retrospectively, including 111 patients underwent Albert-Lembert suture anastomosis and 119 patients underwent hybrid-layered suture anastomosis. Anastomosis construction time was recorded during operation. Anastomotic leakage was recorded through upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast examination. Anastomotic stricture was recorded during follow up.
RESULTS: The hybrid-layered suture was faster than Albert-Lembert suture (29.40±1.24 min vs. 33.83±1.41 min, P=0.02). The overall anastomotic leak rate was 7.82%, the leak rate in hybrid-layered suture group was significantly lower than that in Albert-Lembert suture group (3.36% vs. 12.61%, P=0.01). The overall anastomotic stricture rate was 9.13%, the stricture rate in hybrid-layered suture group was significantly lower than that in Albert-Lembert suture group (5.04% vs. 13.51%, P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Hand sewn ETE CEGA with hybrid-layered suture is associated with lower anastomotic leakage and stricture rate compared to hand sewn ETE CEGA with Albert-Lembert suture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hand sewn anastomosis; cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (CEGA); end-to-end anastomosis; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); esophagectomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26716030      PMCID: PMC4669273          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  32 in total

1.  Ten years' experience with a single layer anastomosis in colon surgery.

Authors:  L P GAMBEE; W GARNJOBST; C E HARDWICK
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Pernilla Viklund; Mats Lindblad; Ming Lu; Weimin Ye; Jan Johansson; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A single-layer open intestinal anastomosis applicable to the small as well as the large intestine.

Authors:  L P GAMBEE
Journal:  West J Surg Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1951-01

4.  Refractory cervical esophagogastric anastomotic strictures: management and outcomes.

Authors:  Samantha J Davis; Lili Zhao; Andrew C Chang; Mark B Orringer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Management of gastrointestinal leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: conventional treatments vs. endoscopic stenting.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Patrick Donohue Rudersdorf; Brian R Smith; Kevin Reavis; Xuan-Mai T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome.

Authors:  Abdollah Behzadi; Francis C Nichols; Stephen D Cassivi; Claude Deschamps; Mark S Allen; Peter C Pairolero
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Gastrojejunal stricture after gastric bypass and efficacy of endoscopic intervention.

Authors:  Abraham Mathew; Michael A Veliuona; Fedele J DePalma; Robert N Cooney
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hsao-Hsun Hsu; Jin-Shing Chen; Pei-Ming Huang; Jang-Ming Lee; Yung-Chie Lee
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  V A Williams; T J Watson; S Zhovtis; O Gellersen; D Raymond; C Jones; J H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Calcification of arteries supplying the gastric tube increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Gefei Zhao; Jiagen Li; Bin Qu; Susheng Shi; Xiaoli Feng; Hao Feng; Jun Jiang; Qi Xue; Jie He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Clinically Relevant Late-Onset Biliary Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Minako Nagai; Kenji Nakagawa; Satoshi Nishiwada; Taichi Terai; Daisuke Hokuto; Satoshi Yasuda; Yasuko Matsuo; Shunsuke Doi; Takahiro Akahori; Masayuki Sho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.282

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.