Literature DB >> 19556748

Developing the blueprint for a genetic testing registry.

G Javitt1, S Katsanis, J Scott, K Hudson.   

Abstract

While the number of genetic tests continues to grow, publicly accessible information about the analytic and clinical validity of such tests is lagging. Information gaps impede informed decision making by health care providers and patients. Enhancing the transparency of information about what tests are being offered, for which indications tests are being offered, and the analytic and clinical validity of tests is a key prerequisite to ensuring test quality. A recent government recommendation for a mandatory genetic test registry has received wide stakeholder support but leaves many practical questions unanswered. We propose a 'blueprint' for the creation of a genetic test registry in order to expedite its implementation. We describe the goals of a registry, propose criteria for the inclusion of registrants and tests in the registry, and define the categories of information that should be included for such tests. We discuss the sources of legal authority that empower the government to mandate that a registry be established and identify the federal agencies with the relevant expertise and resources to do so. We conclude that establishing a registry is a critical first step in the development of a more transparent, quality-centered system of oversight that will better inform and protect the public. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19556748      PMCID: PMC2830737          DOI: 10.1159/000226593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  10 in total

1.  Medical devices; classification/reclassification; restricted devices; analyte specific reagents--FDA. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1997-11-21

Review 2.  Development and integration of molecular genetic tests into clinical practice: the US experience.

Authors:  Jean Amos; W Grody
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 3.  A review and analysis of the clinical laboratory improvement amendment of 1988: compliance plans and enforcement policy.

Authors:  Patrick A Rivers; Aram Dobalian; Francesco A Germinario
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun

4.  GeneTests: an online genetic information resource for health care providers.

Authors:  Roberta A Pagon
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-07

5.  The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes.

Authors:  Matthew D Mailman; Michael Feolo; Yumi Jin; Masato Kimura; Kimberly Tryka; Rinat Bagoutdinov; Luning Hao; Anne Kiang; Justin Paschall; Lon Phan; Natalia Popova; Stephanie Pretel; Lora Ziyabari; Moira Lee; Yu Shao; Zhen Y Wang; Karl Sirotkin; Minghong Ward; Michael Kholodov; Kerry Zbicz; Jeffrey Beck; Michael Kimelman; Sergey Shevelev; Don Preuss; Eugene Yaschenko; Alan Graeff; James Ostell; Stephen T Sherry
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature?

Authors:  Kenneth Offit
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?

Authors:  David J Hunter; Muin J Khoury; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The evidence dilemma in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Al Berg; Ralph Coates; James Evans; Steven M Teutsch; Linda A Bradley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  In search of a coherent framework: options for FDA oversight of genetic tests.

Authors:  Gail H Javitt
Journal:  Food Drug Law J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.619

10.  Molecular genetic testing for ultra rare diseases: models for translation from the research laboratory to the CLIA-certified diagnostic laboratory.

Authors:  S Das; Sherri J Bale; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Consensus: a framework for evaluation of uncertain gene variants in laboratory test reporting.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Perry G Ridge; Andrew R Wilson; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 2.  The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests.

Authors:  Felix W Frueh; Henry T Greely; Robert C Green; Stuart Hogarth; Sue Siegel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Utility of gene-specific algorithms for predicting pathogenicity of uncertain gene variants.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.

Authors:  Christina R Lachance; Lori A H Erby; Beth M Ford; Vincent C Allen; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  PLoS currents: evidence on genomic tests - At the crossroads of translation.

Authors:  Marta Gwinn; W David Dotson; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2010-09-02

6.  Public reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic health tests: A comparison across the US, UK, Japan and Australia.

Authors:  Jan Charbonneau; Dianne Nicol; Don Chalmers; Kazuto Kato; Natsuko Yamamoto; Jarrod Walshe; Christine Critchley
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.351

7.  Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2015.

Authors:  Kristian A Gray; Bethan Yates; Ruth L Seal; Mathew W Wright; Elspeth A Bruford
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 8.  Molecular Genetic Techniques in Biomarker Analysis Relevant for Drugs Centrally Approved in Europe.

Authors:  Tatjana Huebner; Michael Steffens; Catharina Scholl
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  The NIH genetic testing registry: a new, centralized database of genetic tests to enable access to comprehensive information and improve transparency.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein; Donna R Maglott; Jennifer M Lee; Brandi L Kattman; Adriana J Malheiro; Michael Ovetsky; Vichet Hem; Viatcheslav Gorelenkov; Guangfeng Song; Craig Wallin; Nora Husain; Shanmuga Chitipiralla; Kenneth S Katz; Douglas Hoffman; Wonhee Jang; Mark Johnson; Fedor Karmanov; Alexander Ukrainchik; Mikhail Denisenko; Cathy Fomous; Kathy Hudson; James M Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 16.971

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.