Literature DB >> 19555844

Will 3.0-T make coronary magnetic resonance angiography competitive with computed tomography angiography?

Christopher T Sibley, David A Bluemke.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19555844      PMCID： PMC2791396          DOI： 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN： 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Hajime Sakuma; Yasutaka Ichikawa; Shuji Chino; Tadanori Hirano; Katsutoshi Makino; Kan Takeda
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Frequency scouting for cardiac imaging with SSFP at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Janaka Wansapura; Robert Fleck; Eric Crotty; William Gottliebson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-07-08

3.  The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T.

Authors:  H Wen; T J Denison; R W Singerman; R S Balaban
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Regional physiological functions depicted by sequences of rapid magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  D Matthaei; J Frahm; A Haase; W Hänicke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Torsten Sommer; Matthias Hackenbroch; Ulrich Hofer; Alexandra Schmiedel; Winfried A Willinek; Sebastian Flacke; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Rolf Fimmers; Harold Litt; Hans Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Gilbert L Raff; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; James A Goldstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Cosima Jahnke; Ingo Paetsch; Kay Nehrke; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Rolf Gebker; Eckart Fleck; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease?

Authors:  W C Little; M Constantinescu; R J Applegate; M A Kutcher; M T Burrows; F R Kahl; W P Santamore
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40- and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect the coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Jean-Benoît le Polain de Waroux; Joelle Kefer; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Milena J Henzlova; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272
View more
  1 in total

1.  Ultra-high field upper extremity peripheral nerve and non-contrast enhanced vascular imaging.

Authors:  Shailesh B Raval; Cynthia A Britton; Tiejun Zhao; Narayanan Krishnamurthy; Tales Santini; Vijay S Gorantla; Tamer S Ibrahim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.