Literature DB >> 15987709

Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance.

Cosima Jahnke1, Ingo Paetsch, Kay Nehrke, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Rolf Gebker, Eckart Fleck, Eike Nagel.   

Abstract

AIMS: Current imaging of the coronary arteries with magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA) is restricted to limited coverage of the coronary arterial tree and requires complex planning. We present and evaluate a rapid, single-scan MRCA approach with complete coverage of the coronary arterial tree. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent free-breathing, navigator-gated MRCA using a single three-dimensional volume with transversal slice orientation and nearly isotropic spatial resolution (1.2 x 1.2 x 1.4 mm(3)) with coverage of the whole heart [steady-state free precession (SSFP); TR/TE/flip angle: 5.3 ms/2.6 ms/90 degrees ; Philips Intera CV 1.5T]. The acquisition duration per heart beat was individually adapted to the cardiac rest period. Correction of respiratory motion was done using a patient-specific affine prospective navigator technique (two navigator beams: cranio-caudal position on the dome of the right hemidiaphragm and anterior-posterior position on the right chest wall; gating window 10 mm). The diagnostic performance of MRCA in detecting significant coronary stenoses was evaluated against X-ray angiography as the standard of reference (32 patients) using a 16-segment model. Effective scan duration was 18+/-6 min (navigator efficiency: 68+/-14%). In all examinations, the main epicardial vessels [left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA)], including their distal segments and major side branches (number of visible side branches: LAD, 2.0+/-0.9; LCX, 1.5+/-0.6; RCA, 2.3+/-0.9), were reliably visualized. Eighty-three per cent of all coronary segments were evaluable; sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 78, 91, and 89%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The combination of an imaging sequence with an intrinsically high contrast (SSFP) and a sophisticated navigator technique (affine transformation) resulted in high quality, high resolution imaging of the whole coronary arterial tree within a short examination duration. Robustness and diagnostic accuracy may allow for a routine application in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15987709     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  22 in total

1.  [Cardiac functional analysis with MRI].

Authors:  T A Sandner; D Theisen; K U Bauner; M Picciolo; M F Reiser; B J Wintersperger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  MRI versus CT for the detection of coronary artery disease: current state and future promises.

Authors:  Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on "stenoses"?

Authors:  Christof Burgstahler; Stephen Schroeder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  3D MR coronary angiography: optimization of the technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Niek Hendrik Jan Prakken; Evert-Jan P A Vonken; Birgitta K Velthuis; Pieter A F M Doevendans; Maarten-Jan M Cramer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  3D MR coronary angiography: optimization of the technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Cosima Jahnke; Ingo Paetsch; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Acquired coronary disease in children: the role of multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Phalla Ou; Shelby Kutty; Diala Khraiche; Daniel Sidi; Damien Bonnet
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-09-13

10.  Visualization of coronary venous anatomy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  John F Younger; Sven Plein; Andrew Crean; Stephen G Ball; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.