Literature DB >> 19554384

Can porous tantalum be used to achieve ankle and subtalar arthrodesis?: a pilot study.

Arno Frigg1, Hugh Dougall, Steve Boyd, Benno Nigg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A structural graft often is needed to fill gaps during reconstructive procedures of the ankle and hindfoot. Autograft, the current gold standard, is limited in availability and configuration and is associated with donor-site morbidity in as much as 48%, whereas the alternative allograft carries risks of disease transmission and collapse. Trabecular metal (tantalum), with a healing rate similar to that of autograft, high stability, and no donor-site morbidity, has been used in surgery of the hip, knee, and spine. However, its use has not been documented in foot and ankle surgery. We retrospectively reviewed nine patients with complex foot and ankle arthrodeses using a tantalum spacer. Minimum followup was 1.9 years (average, 2 years; range, 1.9-2.4 years). Bone ingrowth into the tantalum was analyzed with micro-CT in three of the nine patients. All arthrodeses were fused clinically and radiographically at the 1- and 2 year followups and no complications occurred. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score increased from 32 to 74. The micro-CT showed bony trabeculae growing onto the tantalum. Our data suggest tantalum may be used as a structural graft option for ankle and subtalar arthrodesis. All nine of our patients achieved fusion and had no complications. Using tantalum obviated the need for harvesting of the iliac spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19554384      PMCID: PMC2795840          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0948-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  57 in total

1.  Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Daniel B Masse; Huijie Leng; Kevin P Hess; Ryan D Ross; Ryan K Roeder; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Jean Charles LeHuec; Christopher Shaffrey
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

3.  The incidence of donor site pain after bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest may be overestimated: a study on spine fracture patients.

Authors:  Diyar Delawi; Wouter J A Dhert; René M Castelein; Abraham J Verbout; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Posterior bone block distraction arthrodesis of the subtalar joint: a review of 22 cases.

Authors:  Jason D Pollard; John M Schuberth
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.286

5.  Particle-induced osteolysis in three-dimensional micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Christian Wedemeyer; Jie Xu; Carl Neuerburg; Stefan Landgraeber; Nasser M Malyar; Fabian von Knoch; Georg Gosheger; Marius von Knoch; Franz Löer; Guido Saxler
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  [Ankle arthrodesis with interposition graft as a salvage procedure after failed total ankle replacement].

Authors:  Stephan Schill
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Treatment of the progressive neuromuscular planovalgus foot deformity with the combined Batchelor-Grice procedure.

Authors:  Vlachou Maria; Dimitriadis Dimitrios
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.

Authors:  P Culpan; V Le Strat; P Piriou; T Judet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-09

10.  Anterior cervical fusion with tantalum implant: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Mariano Fernández-Fairen; Pedro Sala; Manuel Dufoo; Jorge Ballester; Antonio Murcia; Luis Merzthal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Properties of open-cell porous metals and alloys for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Optimal double screw configuration for subtalar arthrodesis: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jun Young Lee; Yeon Soo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The application of porous tantalum cylinder to the repair of comminuted bone defects: a study of rabbit firearm injuries.

Authors:  Bo Ren; Zhenbo Zhai; Kai Guo; Yanpu Liu; Weihuan Hou; Qingsheng Zhu; Jinyu Zhu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

4.  [Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde nails. Description of a hindfoot procedure after massive talus destruction].

Authors:  K Klos; A Lange; G Matziolis; A Wagner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Case report: reconstruction of the distal tibia with porous tantalum spacer after resection for giant cell tumor.

Authors:  K Economopoulos; L Barker; C Beauchamp; R Claridge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Use of a trabecular metal implant in ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Urban Rydholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Substitutes of structural and non-structural autologous bone grafts in hindfoot arthrodeses and osteotomies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc Andreas Müller; Alexander Frank; Matthias Briel; Victor Valderrabano; Patrick Vavken; Vahid Entezari; Arne Mehrkens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Enhanced Biocompatibility in Anodic TaO x Nanotube Arrays.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Zeng; Sheng-Chen Twan; Kuan-Wen Wang; Her-Hsiung Huang; Yen-Bin Hsu; Chien-Ying Wang; Ming-Ying Lan; Sheng-Wei Lee
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.703

10.  Three-Dimensional, MultiScale, and Interconnected Trabecular Bone Mimic Porous Tantalum Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Zhenglin Zhu; Haozuo Xiao; Changqi Luo; Xiaoji Luo; Furong Lv; Junyi Liao; Wei Huang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-08-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.