OBJECTIVE: Sublingual microvascular videomicroscopy can assess tissue perfusion in critically ill patients; however, data analysis is currently limited to delayed off-line evaluation. We hypothesized that a real-time point-of-care (POC) determination of the microcirculatory flow index (MFI), an established metric for assessing microcirculatory perfusion, agrees well with the conventional off-line analysis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Urban academic intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: A heterogeneous population of critically ill patients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A single operator performed side stream darkfield videomicroscopy of the sublingual microcirculation and made a POC determination of MFI in real-time on a portable bedside monitor by assigning a score (0 = no flow to 3 = normal) to each quadrant of the image and averaging the four values. After image processing, de-identification and randomization, the same operator, blinded to the previous interpretation, repeated the MFI assessment by viewing an AVI-formatted image sequence on a 94 cm 1,080 pixel LCD monitor (reference standard). There were 205 paired measurements in 18 subjects. The POC and reference standard MFI had good agreement by Bland-Altman analysis [mean difference of -0.031, SD = 0.198 (95% CI, -0.43 to 0.37)]. The POC assessment was 94% sensitive and 92% specific for detecting impaired microvascular flow (defined a priori as an MFI < 2.5 based on previously published data). CONCLUSIONS: A POC determination of MFI had good agreement with conventional off-line analysis, and was highly sensitive and specific for detecting impaired microvascular flow. This real-time technique may be useful in future clinical trials targeting impaired microcirculatory perfusion in critically ill patients.
OBJECTIVE: Sublingual microvascular videomicroscopy can assess tissue perfusion in critically illpatients; however, data analysis is currently limited to delayed off-line evaluation. We hypothesized that a real-time point-of-care (POC) determination of the microcirculatory flow index (MFI), an established metric for assessing microcirculatory perfusion, agrees well with the conventional off-line analysis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Urban academic intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: A heterogeneous population of critically illpatients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A single operator performed side stream darkfield videomicroscopy of the sublingual microcirculation and made a POC determination of MFI in real-time on a portable bedside monitor by assigning a score (0 = no flow to 3 = normal) to each quadrant of the image and averaging the four values. After image processing, de-identification and randomization, the same operator, blinded to the previous interpretation, repeated the MFI assessment by viewing an AVI-formatted image sequence on a 94 cm 1,080 pixel LCD monitor (reference standard). There were 205 paired measurements in 18 subjects. The POC and reference standard MFI had good agreement by Bland-Altman analysis [mean difference of -0.031, SD = 0.198 (95% CI, -0.43 to 0.37)]. The POC assessment was 94% sensitive and 92% specific for detecting impaired microvascular flow (defined a priori as an MFI < 2.5 based on previously published data). CONCLUSIONS: A POC determination of MFI had good agreement with conventional off-line analysis, and was highly sensitive and specific for detecting impaired microvascular flow. This real-time technique may be useful in future clinical trials targeting impaired microcirculatory perfusion in critically illpatients.
Authors: A Fox-Robichaud; D Payne; S U Hasan; L Ostrovsky; T Fairhead; P Reinhardt; P Kubes Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-06-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Jacques Creteur; Marc-Jacques Dubois; Yasser Sakr; Marc Koch; Colin Verdant; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Yasser Sakr; Marc-Jacques Dubois; Daniel De Backer; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Stephen Trzeciak; Ismail Cinel; R Phillip Dellinger; Nathan I Shapiro; Ryan C Arnold; Joseph E Parrillo; Steven M Hollenberg Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: E Christiaan Boerma; Keshen R Mathura; Peter H J van der Voort; Peter E Spronk; Can Ince Journal: Crit Care Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Steven Hollenberg; Christiaan Boerma; Peter Goedhart; Gustavo Büchele; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Iwan Dobbe; Can Ince Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Diamantino Salgado; Raphaël Favory; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Fauzia Paize; Richard Sarginson; Niten Makwana; Paul B Baines; Alistair P J Thomson; Ian Sinha; C Anthony Hart; Andrew Riordan; Kay C Hawkins; Enitan D Carrol; Christopher M Parry Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Russell S Roberson; Evelyn Lockhart; Nathan I Shapiro; Nicholas Bandarenko; Timothy J McMahon; Michael J Massey; William D White; Elliott Bennett-Guerrero Journal: Transfusion Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Can Ince; E Christiaan Boerma; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Nathan I Shapiro; Jacques Duranteau; Michael R Pinsky; Antonio Artigas; Jean-Louis Teboul; Irwin K M Reiss; Cesar Aldecoa; Sam D Hutchings; Abele Donati; Marco Maggiorini; Fabio S Taccone; Glenn Hernandez; Didier Payen; Dick Tibboel; Daniel S Martin; Alexander Zarbock; Xavier Monnet; Arnaldo Dubin; Jan Bakker; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W L Scheeren Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 17.440