Literature DB >> 16424721

The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects.

Daniel De Backer1, Jacques Creteur, Marc-Jacques Dubois, Yasser Sakr, Marc Koch, Colin Verdant, Jean-Louis Vincent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory blood flow alterations in patients with septic shock.
DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study.
SETTING: A 31-bed, medico-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-two patients with septic shock.
INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous administration of dobutamine (5 mug/kg.min) for 2 hrs (n = 22) followed by the addition of 10 M acetylcholine (topically applied, n = 10).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Complete hemodynamic measurements were obtained before and after dobutamine administration. In addition, the sublingual microcirculation was investigated with an orthogonal polarization spectral imaging technique before and after dobutamine administration and after topical application of acetylcholine. Dobutamine significantly improved capillary perfusion (from 48 +/- 15 to 67 +/- 11%, p = .001), but with large individual variation, whereas capillary density remained stable. The addition of topical acetylcholine completely restored capillary perfusion (98 +/- 1%, p = .001) and capillary density. The changes in capillary perfusion during dobutamine administration were not related to changes in cardiac index (p = .45) or arterial pressure (p = .29). Interestingly, the decrease in lactate levels was proportional to the improvement in capillary perfusion (y = 0.07 - 0.02x, r = .46, p = .005) but not to changes in cardiac index (p = .55).
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of 5 mug/kg.min dobutamine can improve but not restore capillary perfusion in patients with septic shock. These changes are independent of changes in systemic hemodynamic variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16424721     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000198107.61493.5a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  130 in total

1.  Both passive leg raising and intravascular volume expansion improve sublingual microcirculatory perfusion in severe sepsis and septic shock patients.

Authors:  Julien Pottecher; Stéphane Deruddre; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-François Georger; Christian Laplace; Dan Benhamou; Eric Vicaut; Jacques Duranteau
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Venous-to-arterial CO2 differences and the quest for bedside point-of-care monitoring to assess the microcirculation during shock.

Authors:  David N Naumann; Mark J Midwinter; Sam Hutchings
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

3.  Lactate-guided resuscitation saves lives: we are not sure.

Authors:  Jan Bakker; Daniel de Backer; Glenn Hernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Levosimendan in septic shock: another piece in the puzzle, but many pieces are still lacking.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Peter Radermacher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Current treatment of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Ismail Cinel; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Go with the flow--recruit the microcirculation!

Authors:  Can Ince
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury.

Authors:  Hernando Gomez; Can Ince; Daniel De Backer; Peter Pickkers; Didier Payen; John Hotchkiss; John A Kellum
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Ana Paula Neves; Giovanna Occhipinti; Katia Donadello; Gustavo Büchele; Davide Simion; Maria-Luisa Chierego; Tatiana Oliveira Silva; Adriana Fonseca; Jean-Louis Vincent; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mansoor N Bangash; Ming-Li Kong; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Jan Bakker; Maurizio Cecconi; Ludhmila Hajjar; Da Wei Liu; Suzanna Lobo; Xavier Monnet; Andrea Morelli; Sheila Neinan Myatra; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.