Literature DB >> 19540479

Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure.

Elpida Fragouli1, Mandy Katz-Jaffe, Samer Alfarawati, John Stevens, Pere Colls, N-neka Goodall, Sophia Tormasi, Cristina Gutierrez-Mateo, Renata Prates, William B Schoolcraft, Santiago Munne, Dagan Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and transfer cytogenetically normal embryos after screening all chromosomes of first and second polar bodies (PBs) or trophectoderm samples with the use of comparative genomic hybridization.
DESIGN: Clinical research study.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization clinic referring samples to a specialist preimplantation genetic diagnosis laboratory. PATIENT(S): Thirty-two couples with repeated implantation failure. INTERVENTION(S): Zygotes from patients with repeated implantation failure and poor response to ovarian stimulation underwent PB biopsy. Patients with repeated implantation failure who were candidates for blastocyst transfer received trophectoderm biopsy. Zygotes or blastocysts were vitrified while chromosome analysis took place. Euploid embryos were transferred during a subsequent cycle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cytogenetic status and implantation and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): The oocyte and blastocyst aneuploidy rates were 65.5% and 45.2%, respectively. Abnormalities affecting all chromosomes were detected. Implantation and pregnancy rates for the patients with PB biopsy were 11.5% and 21.4%, respectively, whereas for patients receiving blastocyst analysis they were 58.3% and 69.2%. CONCLUSION(S): Initial results for patients of advanced maternal age (39.8 years) with repeated implantation failure and poor ovarian response were encouraging. However, further study is required to confirm whether or not screening is beneficial. Blastocyst analysis was associated with high pregnancy rates, suggesting that comprehensive chromosome screening may assist patients with repeated implantation failure capable of producing blastocysts in achieving pregnancies. Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19540479     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  33 in total

1.  Contributing factors for the incidence of aneuploidy in older patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Mosaic embryo transfer after oocyte in vitro maturation in combination with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)-first report of a euploid live birth.

Authors:  Naomi Inoue; Rosmary Lopez; Andrea Delgado; Denisse Nuñez; Jimmy Portella; Luis Noriega-Hoces; Luis Guzmán
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Patient selection criteria for blastocyst transfers in extended embryo culture programs.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Rogério Bonassi Machado; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Long-read sequencing in deciphering human genetics to a greater depth.

Authors:  Mohit K Midha; Mengchu Wu; Kuo-Ping Chiu
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors which affect the meiotic process.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; G Cavallini; A Crippa; A Capoti; S Resta; F Robles; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Brynn Levy; Jing Su; Lesley E Northrop; Xin Tao; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.