Literature DB >> 19533178

Inter-observer reliability of detecting Dynesys pedicle screw using plain X-rays: a study on 50 post-operative patients.

Fras Dakhil-Jerew1, H Jadeja, A Cohen, J A N Shepperd.   

Abstract

Dynamic stabilisation system for the spine (Dynesys) relies on titanium screw purchase within the pedicle. Decision on osseointegration is important especially when the patient becomes symptomatic following initial good outcome. Loose screws make the construct non-functional especially in symptomatic patients. Removal of Dynesys may become necessary to control patient's symptoms. In this study, we report interobserver reliability of X-ray for the interpretation of Dynesys pedicle screw osseointegration based on the diagnosis of "halo zone" and "Double halo zones" surrounding loose screw. Lumbar spine X-ray images of 50 patients in two views (AP and lateral) were selected from a random sample of 420 Dynesys patients. The total number of pedicle screws reviewed in this study was 260. The investigators (observers) were asked to state whether or not each pedicle screw is loose using "radiolucent zone sign". Observers were two expert orthopaedic spine consultant surgeons and one expert consultant radiologist and four specialist registrars (SpR) in orthopaedics and radiology. SpR assessments were repeated after 4 months with instructions to use "double-halo sign" for loose screws. The evaluation of interobserver agreement was performed by obtaining a Kappa (K) index. Using "radiolucent zone sign", Kappa Index (KI) among three consultants was 0.2198 at 95% CI (0.0520, 0.4916) while for all of the seven assessors (3 consultants and 4 SpR), KI was 0.1462 at 95% CI (0.0332, 0.2592). The use of "double-halo sign" was associated with KI of 0.666 at 95% CI (SE 0.83) among all of the 4 SpR. Based on plain X-ray "radiolucent zone sign", the inter-observer reliability of detecting loose Dynesys pedicle screw was poor (Kappa index of 0.2). On the other hand, using plain X-ray "double-halo sign" was associated with improved inter-observer reliability and validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19533178      PMCID: PMC2899385          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1071-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  42 in total

1.  Enhancement of pedicle screw fixation through washers.

Authors:  Michael F Shepard; Jeffrey C Wang; Rayshad Oshtory; Jung Yoo; J Michael Kabo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone.

Authors:  J Schatzker; J G Horne; G Sumner-Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Hydroxyapatite dip coated and uncoated titanium poly-axial pedicle screws: an in vivo bovine model.

Authors:  Omer S Yildirim; Bunyamin Aksakal; Salih C Hanyaloglu; Fazli Erdogan; Ali Okur
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The significance of radiolucent zones surrounding pedicle screws. Definition of screw loosening in spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  B Sandén; C Olerud; M Petrén-Mallmin; C Johansson; S Larsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

5.  Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christina A Niosi; Qingan A Zhu; Derek C Wilson; Ory Keynan; David R Wilson; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [System of dynamic neutralization in the lumbar spine: experience on 94 cases].

Authors:  M Bordes-Monmeneu; V Bordes-Garcia; F Rodrigo-Baeza; D Saez
Journal:  Neurocirugia (Astur)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.553

7.  Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders.

Authors:  H Pihlajämaki; P Myllynen; O Böstman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

8.  Hydroxyapatite coating improves fixation of pedicle screws. A clinical study.

Authors:  B Sandén; C Olerud; M Petrén-Mallmin; S Larsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

9.  Efficacy of novel-concept pedicle screw fixation augmented with calcium phosphate cement in the osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  Masaya Yazu; Akihiro Kin; Riya Kosaka; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Muneaki Abe
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  Structure of the bone interface to dental implants in vivo.

Authors:  G De Lange; C De Putter
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.779

View more
  14 in total

1.  Late infections after dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with Dynesys.

Authors:  Jon A Lutz; Philippe Otten; Gianluca Maestretti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; David Volkheimer; Sandra Reitmaier; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Annette Kienle; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Radiolucent Zone around Screws is Associated with Position Change of Screw-rod Constructs.

Authors:  Satoru Tanioka; Masashi Fujimoto; Hirofumi Nishikawa; Katsuhiro Tanaka; Fujimaro Ishida; Atsushi Yamamoto; Munenari Ikezawa; Yusuke Kamei; Hidenori Suzuki; Masaki Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Development of a quantitative method to evaluate pedicle screw loosening after spinal instrumentation using digital tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Kentaro Mataki; Yuki Hara; Eriko Okano; Katsuya Nagashima; Hiroshi Noguchi; Yosuke Shibao; Kousei Miura; Hiroshi Takahashi; Toru Funayama; Masao Koda; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  The Change of Sagittal Alignment of the Lumbar Spine after Dynesys Stabilization and Proposal of a Refinement.

Authors:  Won Man Park; Chi Heon Kim; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-07-31

6.  Topping-Off Technology versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangyao Sun; Tongtong Zhang; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Non-fusion procedure using PEEK rod systems for lumbar degenerative diseases: clinical experience with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Weimin Huang; Zhengqi Chang; Ruoxian Song; Ke Zhou; Xiuchun Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Comparison of the Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization System and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jian-Lin Shan; Xiu-Mei Liu; Fang Li; Kai Guan; Tian-Sheng Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Effects of Spinopelvic Parameters and Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on S1 Screw Loosening.

Authors:  Jin-Bum Kim; Seung-Won Park; Young-Seok Lee; Taek-Kyun Nam; Yong-Sook Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

10.  Length of stay, costs, and complications in lumbar disc herniation surgery by standard PLIF versus a new dynamic interspinous stabilization technique.

Authors:  Manuel Segura-Trepichio; David Candela-Zaplana; José Manuel Montoza-Nuñez; Antonio Martin-Benlloch; Andreu Nolasco
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.