Literature DB >> 19528323

Measuring the rates of spontaneous mutation from deep and large-scale polymorphism data.

Philipp W Messer1.   

Abstract

The rates and patterns of spontaneous mutation are fundamental parameters of molecular evolution. Current methodology either tries to measure such rates and patterns directly in mutation-accumulation experiments or tries to infer them indirectly from levels of divergence or polymorphism. While experimental approaches are constrained by the low rate at which new mutations occur, indirect approaches suffer from their underlying assumption that mutations are effectively neutral. Here I present a maximum-likelihood approach to estimate mutation rates from large-scale polymorphism data. It is demonstrated that the method is not sensitive to demography and the distribution of selection coefficients among mutations when applied to mutations at sufficiently low population frequencies. With the many large-scale sequencing projects currently underway, for instance, the 1000 genomes project in humans, plenty of the required low-frequency polymorphism data will shortly become available. My method will allow for an accurate and unbiased inference of mutation rates and patterns from such data sets at high spatial resolution. I discuss how the assessment of several long-standing problems of evolutionary biology would benefit from the availability of accurate mutation rate estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19528323      PMCID: PMC2728861          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.105692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  57 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.

Authors:  Gwenaël Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The genomic rate of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Mutation patterns in the human genome: more variable than expected.

Authors:  Laurent Duret
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome.

Authors:  Laurent Duret; Peter F Arndt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.

Authors:  Adam R Boyko; Scott H Williamson; Amit R Indap; Jeremiah D Degenhardt; Ryan D Hernandez; Kirk E Lohmueller; Mark D Adams; Steffen Schmidt; John J Sninsky; Shamil R Sunyaev; Thomas J White; Rasmus Nielsen; Andrew G Clark; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Mutation--The Engine of Evolution: Studying Mutation and Its Role in the Evolution of Bacteria.

Authors:  Ruth Hershberg
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Selection on Inversion Breakpoints Favors Proximity to Pairing Sensitive Sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Russell B Corbett-Detig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  An abundance of rare functional variants in 202 drug target genes sequenced in 14,002 people.

Authors:  Matthew R Nelson; Daniel Wegmann; Margaret G Ehm; Darren Kessner; Pamela St Jean; Claudio Verzilli; Judong Shen; Zhengzheng Tang; Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Dana Fraser; Liling Warren; Jennifer Aponte; Matthew Zawistowski; Xiao Liu; Hao Zhang; Yong Zhang; Jun Li; Yun Li; Li Li; Peter Woollard; Simon Topp; Matthew D Hall; Keith Nangle; Jun Wang; Gonçalo Abecasis; Lon R Cardon; Sebastian Zöllner; John C Whittaker; Stephanie L Chissoe; John Novembre; Vincent Mooser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Dmitri A Petrov; Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Mikhail Lipatov; Kapa Lenkov; Josefa González
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Development of the variant calling algorithm, ADIScan, and its use to estimate discordant sequences between monozygotic twins.

Authors:  Yangrae Cho; Sunho Lee; Jong Hui Hong; Byong Joon Kim; Woon-Young Hong; Jongcheol Jung; Hyang Burm Lee; Joohon Sung; Han-Na Kim; Hyung-Lae Kim; Jongsun Jung
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Population Genomics of Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Ryan Gutenkunst; Matthew Ackerman; Ken Spitze; Zhiqiang Ye; Takahiro Maruki; Zhiyuan Jia
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments.

Authors:  Jon Seger; Wendy A Smith; Jarom J Perry; Jessalynn Hunn; Zofia A Kaliszewska; Luciano La Sala; Luciana Pozzi; Victoria J Rowntree; Frederick R Adler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Rates and genomic consequences of spontaneous mutational events in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; David Houle; Michael Lynch; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Strong mutational bias toward deletions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome is compensated by selection.

Authors:  Evgeny V Leushkin; Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.