Literature DB >> 27343234

Selection on Inversion Breakpoints Favors Proximity to Pairing Sensitive Sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Russell B Corbett-Detig1.   

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions are widespread among taxa, and have been implicated in a number of biological processes including adaptation, sex chromosome evolution, and segregation distortion. Consistent with selection favoring linkage between loci, it is well established that length is a selected trait of inversions. However, the factors that affect the distribution of inversion breakpoints remain poorly understood. "Sensitive sites" have been mapped on all euchromatic chromosome arms in Drosophila melanogaster, and may be a source of natural selection on inversion breakpoint positions. Briefly, sensitive sites are genomic regions wherein proximal structural rearrangements result in large reductions in local recombination rates in heterozygotes. Here, I show that breakpoints of common inversions are significantly more likely to lie within a cytological band containing a sensitive site than are breakpoints of rare inversions. Furthermore, common inversions for which neither breakpoint intersects a sensitive site are significantly longer than rare inversions, but common inversions whose breakpoints intersect a sensitive site show no evidence for increased length. I interpret these results to mean that selection favors inversions whose breakpoints disrupt synteny near to sensitive sites, possibly because these inversions suppress recombination in large genomic regions. To my knowledge this is the first evidence consistent with positive selection acting on inversion breakpoint positions.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; breakpoints; chromosomal inversions; sensitive sites; structural variation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27343234      PMCID: PMC5012391          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.190389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  29 in total

1.  Interchromosomal effects and the relation between crossing-over and nondisjunction.

Authors:  P ROBERTS
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  On the fertility effects of pericentric inversions.

Authors:  A Navarro; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Identification and characterization of the TRIP8 and REEP3 genes on chromosome 10q21.3 as novel candidate genes for autism.

Authors:  Dries Castermans; Joris R Vermeesch; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Jean G Steyaert; Wim J M Van de Ven; John W M Creemers; Koen Devriendt
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 13.915

6.  The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; W Meyers; A P Crittenden; P Sniegowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cloning of the breakpoints of a de novo inversion of chromosome 8, inv (8)(p11.2q23.1) in a patient with Ambras syndrome.

Authors:  M Tadin-Strapps; D Warburton; F A M Baumeister; S G Fischer; J Yonan; T C Gilliam; A M Christiano
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  The effects of translocations on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  K S McKim; A M Howell; A M Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Population genomics of inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Russell B Corbett-Detig; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  8 in total

1.  Fine-Mapping Complex Inversion Breakpoints and Investigating Somatic Pairing in the Anopheles gambiae Species Complex Using Proximity-Ligation Sequencing.

Authors:  Russell B Corbett-Detig; Iskander Said; Maria Calzetta; Max Genetti; Jakob McBroome; Nicholas W Maurer; Vincenzo Petrarca; Alessandra Della Torre; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Cyclically Seasonal Drosophila subobscura Inversion O7 Originated From Fragile Genomic Sites and Relocated Immunity and Metabolic Genes.

Authors:  Charikleia Karageorgiou; Rosa Tarrío; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Fine-Scale Position Effects Shape the Distribution of Inversion Breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jakob McBroome; David Liang; Russell Corbett-Detig
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Cluster expansion of apolipoprotein D (ApoD) genes in teleost fishes.

Authors:  Langyu Gu; Canwei Xia
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Consequences of partially recessive deleterious genetic variation for the evolution of inversions suppressing recombination between sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Colin Olito; Suvi Ponnikas; Bengt Hansson; Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Origin and Consequences of Chromosomal Inversions in the virilis Group of Drosophila.

Authors:  Micael Reis; Cristina P Vieira; Rodrigo Lata; Nico Posnien; Jorge Vieira
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Muller "Elements" in Drosophila: How the Search for the Genetic Basis for Speciation Led to the Birth of Comparative Genomics.

Authors:  Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Varied Genomic Responses to Maladaptive Gene Flow and Their Evidence.

Authors:  Marius Roesti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.