Literature DB >> 29143404

Tool for osteoarthritis risk prediction (TOARP) over 8 years using baseline clinical data, X-ray, and MRI: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Gabby B Joseph1, Charles E McCulloch2, Michael C Nevitt2, Jan Neumann1, Alexandra S Gersing1, Martin Kretzschmar1, Benedikt J Schwaiger1, John A Lynch2, Ursula Heilmeier1, Nancy E Lane3, Thomas M Link1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA), a multifactorial disease causing joint degeneration, often leads to severe disability. The rising rates of disability highlight the need for implementing preventative measures at early stages of the disease, which would especially benefit subjects at high risk for OA development.
PURPOSE: To develop a risk prediction tool for moderate-severe OA (TOARP) over 8 years based on subject characteristics, knee radiographs, and MRI data at baseline using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
SUBJECTS: 641 subjects with no/mild radiographic OA (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] 0-2) and no clinically significant symptoms (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC] 0-1) were selected from the OAI. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: MR images were obtained using 3.0T. ASSESSMENT: Compartment-specific cartilage and meniscus morphology and cartilage T2 were assessed. Baseline subject demographics, risk factors, KL score, cartilage WORMS score, presence of meniscus tear, and cartilage T2 were used to predict the development of moderate/severe OA (KL = 3-4 or WOMAC pain ≥5 or total knee replacement [TKR]) over 8 years. STATISTICAL TESTS: Best subsets variable selection followed by cross-validation were used to assess which combinations of variables best predict moderate/severe OA.
RESULTS: Model 1 included KL score, previous knee injury in the last 12 months, age, gender, and BMI. Model 2 included all variables in Model 1 plus presence of cartilage defects in the lateral femur and patella, and presence of a meniscal tear. Model 3 included all variables in Models 1 and 2, plus cartilage T2 in the medial tibia and medial femur. Compared to Model 1 (cross-validated AUC = 0.67), Model 3 performed significantly better (AUC = 0.72, P = 0.04), while Model 2 showed a statistical trend (AUC = 0.71, P = 0.08). DATA
CONCLUSION: We established a risk calculator for the development of moderate/severe knee OA over 8 years that includes radiographic and MRI data. The inclusion of MRI-based morphological abnormalities and cartilage T2 significantly improved model performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1517-1526.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; cartilage T2; osteoarthritis; risk model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29143404      PMCID: PMC5955763          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  45 in total

1.  The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. A prospective study.

Authors:  T E Hewett; T N Lindenfeld; J V Riccobene; F R Noyes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Association of cartilage degeneration with four year weight gain--3T MRI data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  M D Bucknor; L Nardo; G B Joseph; H Alizai; W Srikhum; M C Nevitt; J A Lynch; C E McCulloch; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Nottingham knee osteoarthritis risk prediction models.

Authors:  Weiya Zhang; Daniel F McWilliams; Sarah L Ingham; Sally A Doherty; Stella Muthuri; Kenneth R Muir; Michael Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Positive effects of moderate exercise on glycosaminoglycan content in knee cartilage: a four-month, randomized, controlled trial in patients at risk of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; Leif Dahlberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-11

7.  Early T2 changes predict onset of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Hans Liebl; Gabby Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Nathan Singh; Ursula Heilmeier; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Pia M Jungmann; Charles E McCulloch; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Association of Physical Activity Measured by Accelerometer, Knee Joint Abnormalities, and Cartilage T2 Measurements Obtained From 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  M Kretzschmar; W Lin; L Nardo; G B Joseph; D D Dunlop; U Heilmeier; M C Nevitt; H Alizai; C E McCulloch; J A Lynch; T M Link
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status.

Authors:  F Eckstein; S Maschek; W Wirth; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; B Wyman; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons.

Authors:  David J Johns; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Susan A Jebb; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.910

View more
  17 in total

1.  Deep learning risk assessment models for predicting progression of radiographic medial joint space loss over a 48-MONTH follow-up period.

Authors:  B Guan; F Liu; A Haj-Mirzaian; S Demehri; A Samsonov; T Neogi; A Guermazi; R Kijowski
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Prediction of Total Knee Replacement and Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis by Using Deep Learning on Knee Radiographs: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Kevin Leung; Bofei Zhang; Jimin Tan; Yiqiu Shen; Krzysztof J Geras; James S Babb; Kyunghyun Cho; Gregory Chang; Cem M Deniz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Introduction of an MR-based semi-quantitative score for assessing partial meniscectomy and relation to knee joint degenerative disease: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Dong Sun; Jan Neumann; Gabby B Joseph; Sarah Foreman; Michael C Nevitt; Charles E McCulloch; Xiaoming Li; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  AI MSK clinical applications: cartilage and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Jae Ho Sohn; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Machine learning to predict incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis over 8 Years using combined MR imaging features, demographics, and clinical factors: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  G B Joseph; C E McCulloch; M C Nevitt; T M Link; J H Sohn
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Open Source Software for Automatic Subregional Assessment of Knee Cartilage Degradation Using Quantitative T2 Relaxometry and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Kevin A Thomas; Dominik Krzemiński; Łukasz Kidziński; Rohan Paul; Elka B Rubin; Eni Halilaj; Marianne S Black; Akshay Chaudhari; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Diabetics show accelerated progression of knee cartilage and meniscal lesions: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Jan Neumann; Julio B Guimaraes; Ursula Heilmeier; Gabby B Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Editorial comment: the future of compositional MRI for cartilage.

Authors:  Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Prognostic models for knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhong; Liping Si; Guangcheng Zhang; Jiayu Huo; Yue Xing; Yangfan Hu; Huan Zhang; Weiwu Yao
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 10.  Defining and predicting radiographic knee osteoarthritis progression: a systematic review of findings from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Peter Y Joo; Alireza Borjali; Antonia F Chen; Orhun K Muratoglu; Kartik M Varadarajan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.