Literature DB >> 15596377

Cartilage volume quantification via Live Wire segmentation.

Alexander J Gougoutas1, Andrew J Wheaton, Arijitt Borthakur, Erik M Shapiro, J Bruce Kneeland, Jayaram K Udupa, Ravinder Reddy.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: A reduction in cartilage volume is characteristic of osteoarthritis and hence there exists a need for an accurate and reproducible method to measure in vivo cartilage volume. Quantification of cartilage volume from magnetic resonance (MR) images requires a segmentation technique such as the user-driven "Live Wire" strategy that can reliably delineate object volumes in a time-efficient manner. In the present work, the accuracy and reproducibility of the Live Wire method for the quantification of cartilage volume in MR images is evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of the Live Wire method was assessed by comparing the MR-based volume measurement of a patellar cartilage-shaped phantom versus data calculated via water displacement. The inter- and intra-operator reproducibility of the technique was evaluated from Live Wire segmentation of the patellar cartilage volume from fat-suppressed 3-dimensional spoiled-gradient-echo images of five healthy human volunteers performed by three operators. To provide data for analysis of inter-scan reproducibility, the human scans were repeated five times with the aid of a leg-restraining jig to minimize repositioning error.
RESULTS: The volume of the patellar cartilage-shaped phantom measured via Live Wire segmentation of MR images was within 97.8% of its true volume. The average inter- and intra-operator coefficients of variation of three operators were 3.0% and 0.4%, respectively. The average inter-scan coefficient of variation of five repeated scans of each volunteer was 2.7%.
CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the Live Wire strategy is an accurate, reproducible, and efficient technique to measure cartilage volume in vivo in a feasible amount of operator time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15596377     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  11 in total

1.  Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of volume measurement of knee cartilage segmented from the OAI MR image set using a novel semi-automated segmentation method.

Authors:  K T Bae; H Shim; C Tao; S Chang; J H Wang; R Boudreau; C K Kwoh
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Hyungseok Jang; Alexey Samsonov; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Diseased Region Detection of Longitudinal Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Chao Huang; Liang Shan; H Cecil Charles; Wolfgang Wirth; Marc Niethammer; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Quantitative MR imaging using "LiveWire" to measure tibiofemoral articular cartilage thickness.

Authors:  M E Bowers; N Trinh; G A Tung; J J Crisco; B B Kimia; B C Fleming
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Anatomically anchored template-based level set segmentation: application to quadriceps muscles in MR images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Prescott; Thomas M Best; Mark S Swanson; Furqan Haq; Rebecca D Jackson; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Effects of ACL interference screws on articular cartilage volume and thickness measurements with 1.5 T and 3 T MRI.

Authors:  M E Bowers; G A Tung; N Trinh; E Leventhal; J J Crisco; B Kimia; B C Fleming
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee.

Authors:  Jurgen Fripp; Stuart Crozier; Simon K Warfield; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 8.  MRI-based hip cartilage measures in osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic individuals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hector N Aguilar; Michele C Battié; Jacob L Jaremko
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2017-03-22

9.  Increased cartilage volume after injection of hyaluronic acid in osteoarthritis knee patients who underwent high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Keerati Chareancholvanich; Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong; Rapeepat Narkbunnam
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study.

Authors:  Jennifer R McKinney; Marshall S Sussman; Rahim Moineddin; Afsaneh Amirabadi; Tammy Rayner; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.