RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A reduction in cartilage volume is characteristic of osteoarthritis and hence there exists a need for an accurate and reproducible method to measure in vivo cartilage volume. Quantification of cartilage volume from magnetic resonance (MR) images requires a segmentation technique such as the user-driven "Live Wire" strategy that can reliably delineate object volumes in a time-efficient manner. In the present work, the accuracy and reproducibility of the Live Wire method for the quantification of cartilage volume in MR images is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of the Live Wire method was assessed by comparing the MR-based volume measurement of a patellar cartilage-shaped phantom versus data calculated via water displacement. The inter- and intra-operator reproducibility of the technique was evaluated from Live Wire segmentation of the patellar cartilage volume from fat-suppressed 3-dimensional spoiled-gradient-echo images of five healthy human volunteers performed by three operators. To provide data for analysis of inter-scan reproducibility, the human scans were repeated five times with the aid of a leg-restraining jig to minimize repositioning error. RESULTS: The volume of the patellar cartilage-shaped phantom measured via Live Wire segmentation of MR images was within 97.8% of its true volume. The average inter- and intra-operator coefficients of variation of three operators were 3.0% and 0.4%, respectively. The average inter-scan coefficient of variation of five repeated scans of each volunteer was 2.7%. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the Live Wire strategy is an accurate, reproducible, and efficient technique to measure cartilage volume in vivo in a feasible amount of operator time.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A reduction in cartilage volume is characteristic of osteoarthritis and hence there exists a need for an accurate and reproducible method to measure in vivo cartilage volume. Quantification of cartilage volume from magnetic resonance (MR) images requires a segmentation technique such as the user-driven "Live Wire" strategy that can reliably delineate object volumes in a time-efficient manner. In the present work, the accuracy and reproducibility of the Live Wire method for the quantification of cartilage volume in MR images is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of the Live Wire method was assessed by comparing the MR-based volume measurement of a patellar cartilage-shaped phantom versus data calculated via water displacement. The inter- and intra-operator reproducibility of the technique was evaluated from Live Wire segmentation of the patellar cartilage volume from fat-suppressed 3-dimensional spoiled-gradient-echo images of five healthy human volunteers performed by three operators. To provide data for analysis of inter-scan reproducibility, the human scans were repeated five times with the aid of a leg-restraining jig to minimize repositioning error. RESULTS: The volume of the patellar cartilage-shaped phantom measured via Live Wire segmentation of MR images was within 97.8% of its true volume. The average inter- and intra-operator coefficients of variation of three operators were 3.0% and 0.4%, respectively. The average inter-scan coefficient of variation of five repeated scans of each volunteer was 2.7%. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the Live Wire strategy is an accurate, reproducible, and efficient technique to measure cartilage volume in vivo in a feasible amount of operator time.
Authors: Chao Huang; Liang Shan; H Cecil Charles; Wolfgang Wirth; Marc Niethammer; Hongtu Zhu Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Jeffrey W Prescott; Thomas M Best; Mark S Swanson; Furqan Haq; Rebecca D Jackson; Metin N Gurcan Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: M E Bowers; G A Tung; N Trinh; E Leventhal; J J Crisco; B Kimia; B C Fleming Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Jennifer R McKinney; Marshall S Sussman; Rahim Moineddin; Afsaneh Amirabadi; Tammy Rayner; Andrea S Doria Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.365