Literature DB >> 25128683

Automatic atlas-based three-label cartilage segmentation from MR knee images.

Liang Shan1, Christopher Zach2, Cecil Charles3, Marc Niethammer4.   

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of joint disease and often characterized by cartilage changes. Accurate quantitative methods are needed to rapidly screen large image databases to assess changes in cartilage morphology. We therefore propose a new automatic atlas-based cartilage segmentation method for future automatic OA studies. Atlas-based segmentation methods have been demonstrated to be robust and accurate in brain imaging and therefore also hold high promise to allow for reliable and high-quality segmentations of cartilage. Nevertheless, atlas-based methods have not been well explored for cartilage segmentation. A particular challenge is the thinness of cartilage, its relatively small volume in comparison to surrounding tissue and the difficulty to locate cartilage interfaces - for example the interface between femoral and tibial cartilage. This paper focuses on the segmentation of femoral and tibial cartilage, proposing a multi-atlas segmentation strategy with non-local patch-based label fusion which can robustly identify candidate regions of cartilage. This method is combined with a novel three-label segmentation method which guarantees the spatial separation of femoral and tibial cartilage, and ensures spatial regularity while preserving the thin cartilage shape through anisotropic regularization. Our segmentation energy is convex and therefore guarantees globally optimal solutions. We perform an extensive validation of the proposed method on 706 images of the Pfizer Longitudinal Study. Our validation includes comparisons of different atlas segmentation strategies, different local classifiers, and different types of regularizers. To compare to other cartilage segmentation approaches we validate based on the 50 images of the SKI10 dataset.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlas; Automatic; Cartilage; Segmentation; Three-label

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128683      PMCID: PMC5025945          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  21 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  LOGISMOS--layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint.

Authors:  Yin Yin; Xiangmin Zhang; Rachel Williams; Xiaodong Wu; Donald D Anderson; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Globally minimal surfaces by continuous maximal flows.

Authors:  Ben Appleton; Hugues Talbot
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.

Authors:  P Aljabar; R A Heckemann; A Hammers; J V Hajnal; D Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  AUTOMATIC MULTI-ATLAS-BASED CARTILAGE SEGMENTATION FROM KNEE MR IMAGES.

Authors:  Liang Shan; Cecil Charles; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-12-31

7.  Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach.

Authors:  Jenny Folkesson; Erik B Dam; Ole F Olsen; Paola C Pettersen; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3D magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Pierre Dodin; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; François Abram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Primal/dual linear programming and statistical atlases for cartilage segmentation.

Authors:  Ben Glocker; Nikos Komodakis; Nikos Paragios; Christian Glaser; Georgios Tziritas; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2007

10.  Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Schnier; M Haubner; J Priebsch; C Glaser; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Automatic segmentation of high- and low-field knee MRIs using knee image quantification with data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Erik B Dam; Martin Lillholm; Joselene Marques; Mads Nielsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-04-20

3.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Structure-enhanced local phase filtering using L0 gradient minimization for efficient semiautomated knee magnetic resonance imaging segmentation.

Authors:  Mikhiel Lim; Ilker Hacihaliloglu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-02

5.  Diseased Region Detection of Longitudinal Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Chao Huang; Liang Shan; H Cecil Charles; Wolfgang Wirth; Marc Niethammer; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Layer-specific analysis of femorotibial cartilage t2 relaxation time based on registration of segmented double echo steady state (dess) to multi-echo-spin-echo (mese) images.

Authors:  David Fürst; Wolfang Wirth; Akshay Chaudhari; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Mert R Sabuncu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Learning-Based Cost Functions for 3-D and 4-D Multi-Surface Multi-Object Segmentation of Knee MRI: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Satyananda Kashyap; Honghai Zhang; Karan Rao; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 9.  T1ρ magnetic resonance: basic physics principles and applications in knee and intervertebral disc imaging.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng; Qinwei Zhang; Xiaojuan Li; Weitian Chen; Anil Ahuja; Jing Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-12

10.  Fully automatic analysis of the knee articular cartilage T1ρ relaxation time using voxel-based relaxometry.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Xiaojuan Li; Favian Su; Nathaniel Calixto; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.