BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR: the ratio of metastatic to total retrieved nodes) has shown prognostic significance in several tumors. Its role in patients with colorectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic resection is still not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of LNR on long-term outcome in patients undergoing curative laparoscopic resection. METHODS: Patients' data were retrieved from our prospective in-hospital collected data of patients that underwent laparoscopic surgery for curable colorectal cancer over a 6-year period. Long-term data were collected from our outpatient's clinic data and personal contact when necessary. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients underwent laparoscopic resection for curable colorectal cancer in the study period. Sixty-five patients were node positive. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis selected 0.13 as the best LNR cutoff value in this group. Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival analysis revealed a significant decrease in overall and disease-free survival in patients with an LNR above 0.13. Long-term outcome of patients with an LNR below 0.13 was similar to node-negative stage II patients. CONCLUSIONS: The lymph node ratio is a valuable prognostic factor in node-positive colon cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection. Patients with an LNR below 0.13 have the same long-term outcome as stage II node-negative patients. The laparoscopic approach presents the same trends in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival as conventional open access when LNR is considered.
BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR: the ratio of metastatic to total retrieved nodes) has shown prognostic significance in several tumors. Its role in patients with colorectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic resection is still not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of LNR on long-term outcome in patients undergoing curative laparoscopic resection. METHODS:Patients' data were retrieved from our prospective in-hospital collected data of patients that underwent laparoscopic surgery for curable colorectal cancer over a 6-year period. Long-term data were collected from our outpatient's clinic data and personal contact when necessary. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients underwent laparoscopic resection for curable colorectal cancer in the study period. Sixty-five patients were node positive. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis selected 0.13 as the best LNR cutoff value in this group. Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival analysis revealed a significant decrease in overall and disease-free survival in patients with an LNR above 0.13. Long-term outcome of patients with an LNR below 0.13 was similar to node-negative stage II patients. CONCLUSIONS: The lymph node ratio is a valuable prognostic factor in node-positive colon cancerpatients undergoing laparoscopic resection. Patients with an LNR below 0.13 have the same long-term outcome as stage II node-negative patients. The laparoscopic approach presents the same trends in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival as conventional open access when LNR is considered.
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; Mark S Talamonti; David P Winchester; Thomas R Russell; Clifford Y Ko Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Gennaro Galizia; Michele Orditura; Francesca Ferraraccio; Paolo Castellano; Margherita Pinto; Anna Zamboli; Sabrina Cecere; Ferdinando De Vita; Carlo Pignatelli; Eva Lieto Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Robert Rosenberg; Jan Friederichs; Tibor Schuster; Ralf Gertler; Matthias Maak; Karen Becker; Anne Grebner; Kurt Ulm; Heinz Höfler; Hjalmar Nekarda; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marianne Huebner; Michael Kendrick; Kaye M Reid-Lombardo; Florencia Que; Terry Therneau; Rui Qin; John Donohue; David Nagorney; Michael Farnell; Michael Sarr Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: M Medani; Niall Kelly; George Samaha; G Duff; Vourneen Healy; Elizabeth Mulcahy; Eoghan Condon; David Waldron; Jean Saunders; J Calvin Coffey Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Philipp Schrembs; Benedikt Martin; Matthias Anthuber; Gerhard Schenkirsch; Bruno Märkl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 3.240