Literature DB >> 19514717

Using two chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents for molecular imaging studies.

M Meser Ali1, Guanshu Liu, Tejas Shah, Chris A Flask, Mark D Pagel.   

Abstract

Responsive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents can change MR image contrast in response to a molecular biomarker. Quantitative detection of the biomarker requires an accounting of the other effects that may alter MR image contrast, such as a change in the agent's concentration, magnetic field variations, and hardware sensitivity profiles. A second unresponsive MRI contrast agent may serve as an "internal control" to isolate the detection of the molecular biomarker. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI contrast agents can be selectively detected, providing the opportunity to combine a responsive CEST agent and an unresponsive CEST agent during the same MRI scan session. When two CEST MRI contrast agents are used for molecular imaging applications, the CEST agents should be designed to maximize accurate quantification of the concentrations of the two agents. From a chemical perspective, CEST agents behave like enzymes that catalyze the conversion of an unsaturated water "substrate" into a saturated water "product". The analysis of CEST agent kinetics parallels the Michaelis-Menten analysis of enzyme kinetics, which can be used to correlate the CEST effect with the concentration of the agent in solution. If the concentration of water "substrate" that is available to the CEST agent is unknown, which may be likely for in vivo MRI studies, then only a ratio of concentrations of the two CEST agents can be measured. In both cases, CEST agents should be designed with minimal T(1) relaxivity to improve concentration quantifications. CEST agents can also be designed to maximize sensitivity. This may be accomplished by incorporating many CEST agents within nanoparticles to create a large number of exchangeable protons per nanoparticle. Finally, CEST agents can be designed with rapid detection in mind. This may be accomplished by minimizing T(1) relaxivity of the CEST agent so that MRI acquisition methods have time to collect many MRI signals following a single selective saturation period. In this Account, we provide an example that shows the sensitive and rapid detection of two CEST agents in an in vivo MRI study of a mouse model of mammary carcinoma. The ratio of the concentrations of the two CEST agents was quantified with analysis methods that parallel Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetic analysis. This example demonstrates current limitations of the method that require additional research, but it also shows that two CEST MRI contrast agents can be detected and quantitatively assessed during in vivo molecular imaging studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19514717      PMCID: PMC6010180          DOI: 10.1021/ar8002738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  27 in total

1.  Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review.

Authors:  R M Henkelman; G J Stanisz; S J Graham
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Dynamic imaging with MRI contrast agents: quantitative considerations.

Authors:  Mikhail G Shapiro; Tatjana Atanasijevic; Henryk Faas; Gil G Westmeyer; Alan Jasanoff
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  A Note on the Kinetics of Enzyme Action.

Authors:  G E Briggs; J B Haldane
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1925       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  A R2/R1 ratiometric procedure for a concentration-independent, pH-responsive, Gd(III)-based MRI agent.

Authors:  Silvio Aime; Franco Fedeli; Alberto Sanino; Enzo Terreno
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Numerical solution of the Bloch equations provides insights into the optimum design of PARACEST agents for MRI.

Authors:  Donald E Woessner; Shanrong Zhang; Matthew E Merritt; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  First ex-vivo MRI co-localization of two LIPOCEST agents.

Authors:  Enzo Terreno; Daniela Delli Castelli; Luciano Milone; Simona Rollet; Joseph Stancanello; Elisabetta Violante; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Enzyme-responsive PARACEST MRI contrast agents: a new biomedical imaging approach for studies of the proteasome.

Authors:  Byunghee Yoo; Manu S Raam; Rachel M Rosenblum; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Synthesis and relaxometric studies of a dendrimer-based pH-responsive MRI contrast agent.

Authors:  M Meser Ali; Mark Woods; Peter Caravan; Ana C L Opina; Marga Spiller; James C Fettinger; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  Europium(III) macrocyclic complexes with alcohol pendant groups as chemical exchange saturation transfer agents.

Authors:  Mark Woods; Donald E Woessner; Piyu Zhao; Azhar Pasha; Meng-Yin Yang; Ching-Hui Huang; Olga Vasalitiy; Janet R Morrow; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Design and characterization of a new irreversible responsive PARACEST MRI contrast agent that detects nitric oxide.

Authors:  Guanshu Liu; Yuguo Li; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  57 in total

1.  Iron(II) PARACEST MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Sarina J Dorazio; Pavel B Tsitovich; Kevin E Siters; Joseph A Spernyak; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Lanthanide probes for bioresponsive imaging.

Authors:  Marie C Heffern; Lauren M Matosziuk; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  A review of optimization and quantification techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI toward sensitive in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Jinsuh Kim; Yin Wu; Yingkun Guo; Hairong Zheng; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Fluorescent and lanthanide labeling for ligand screens, assays, and imaging.

Authors:  Jatinder S Josan; Channa R De Silva; Byunghee Yoo; Ronald M Lynch; Mark D Pagel; Josef Vagner; Victor J Hruby
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

5.  Detection of Enzyme Activity and Inhibition during Studies in Solution, In Vitro and In Vivo with CatalyCEST MRI.

Authors:  Sanhita Sinharay; Edward A Randtke; Christine M Howison; Natalia A Ignatenko; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Evaluations of extracellular pH within in vivo tumors using acidoCEST MRI.

Authors:  Liu Qi Chen; Christine M Howison; Justin J Jeffery; Ian F Robey; Phillip H Kuo; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Anthranilic acid analogs as diamagnetic CEST MRI contrast agents that feature an intramolecular-bond shifted hydrogen.

Authors:  Xiaolei Song; Xing Yang; Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Martin G Pomper; Michael T McMahon
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Brain temperature by Biosensor Imaging of Redundant Deviation in Shifts (BIRDS): comparison between TmDOTP5- and TmDOTMA-.

Authors:  Daniel Coman; Hubert K Trubel; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Agents: Quantum Chemistry and MRI.

Authors:  Jikun Li; Xinxin Feng; Wei Zhu; Nikita Oskolkov; Tianhui Zhou; Boo Kyung Kim; Noman Baig; Michael T McMahon; Eric Oldfield
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.236

10.  Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer is Unaffected by Modest Changes in Pressure.

Authors:  Benjamin C Webber; Christiane E Carney; Mark Woods
Journal:  Eur J Inorg Chem       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.