Literature DB >> 19506975

National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality.

Jessica P Simons1, Shimul A Shah, Sing Chau Ng, Giles F Whalen, Jennifer F Tseng.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: National studies on in-hospital pancreatic outcomes have focused on mortality. Non-fatal morbidity affects a greater proportion of patients.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998-2006 was queried for discharges after pancreatectomy. Rates of major complications (myocardial infarction, aspiration pneumonia, pulmonary compromise, perforation, infection, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hemorrhage, or reopening of laparotomy) were assessed. Predictors of complication(s) were evaluated using logistic regression. Their independent effect on in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition was assessed.
RESULTS: Of 102,417 patient discharges, 22.7% experienced a complication. Complication rates did not decline significantly over time, while mortality rates did. Independent predictors of complications included age >or=75 [referent, 19-39; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5, p < 0.0001], total pancreatectomy (vs proximal, OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.1-1.5, p = 0.0025), and low hospital resection volume (vs high, OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.4-1.8, p < 0.0001). Complications were a significant independent predictor of death (OR 7.76, 95%CI 6.7-8.8, p < 0.0001), prolonged hospital stay (OR 6.94, 95%CI 6.2-7.7, p < 0.0001), and discharge to another facility (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.26-0.3, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in mortality, complication rates remain substantial and largely unchanged. They predict in-hospital mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and delayed return to home. The impact on healthcare costs and quality of life deserves further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506975     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0936-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  25 in total

1.  Can administrative data be used to ascertain clinically significant postoperative complications?

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Michael E Schembri; Julie A Rainwater
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

5.  Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue.

Authors:  J H Silber; S V Williams; H Krakauer; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Peter W T Pisters; Jeffrey E Lee; Huamin Wang; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Do preoperative biliary stents increase postpancreaticoduodenectomy complications?

Authors:  T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; H A Pitt; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A modern analysis of morbidity after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Stephen W Behrman; Benjamin T Rush; Raza A Dilawari
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer. Results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer.

Authors:  R H Janes; J E Niederhuber; J S Chmiel; D P Winchester; K C Ocwieja; J H Karnell; R E Clive; H R Menck
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  44 in total

1.  Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource.

Authors:  Purvi Parikh; Mira Shiloach; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Comparison of observed to predicted outcomes using the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Harveshp D Mogal; Nora Fino; Clancy Clark; Perry Shen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Novel diagnostics for aggravating pancreatic fistulas at the acute phase after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Tsutomu Fujii; Hideki Takami; Masaya Suenaga; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Suguru Yamada; Daisuke Kobayashi; Chie Tanaka; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes at a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  C K Jakhmola; Ameet Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-10-08

5.  Relative Contributions of Complications and Failure to Rescue on Mortality in Older Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Nina P Tamirisa; Abhishek D Parmar; Gabriela M Vargas; Hemalkumar B Mehta; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Influence of visceral obesity for postoperative pulmonary complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Atsushi Shimizu; Masaji Tani; Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Motoki Miyazawa; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Incidence and severity of pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Richard A Burkhart; Susan M Gerber; Renee M Tholey; Kathleen M Lamb; Anitha Somasundaram; Caitlin A McIntyre; Eliza C Fradkin; Annie P Ashok; Robert F Felte; Jaya M Mehta; Ernest L Rosato; Harish Lavu; Serge A Jabbour; Charles J Yeo; Jordan M Winter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Critical appraisal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thilo Welsch; Hanna Eisele; Stefanie Zschäbitz; Ulf Hinz; Markus W Büchler; Moritz N Wente
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  The Health Gain Obtainable from Pancreatic Resection for Adenocarcinoma in the Elderly.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchetti; Giorgio Ercolani; Raffaele Pezzilli; Matteo Cescon; Giacomo Frascaroli; Antonio Daniele Pinna
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: does timing matter?

Authors:  Gyulnara G Kasumova; Mariam F Eskander; Tara S Kent; Sing Chau Ng; A James Moser; Muneeb Ahmed; Douglas K Pleskow; Mark P Callery; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.