Literature DB >> 15328799

A modern analysis of morbidity after pancreatic resection.

Stephen W Behrman1, Benjamin T Rush, Raza A Dilawari.   

Abstract

Complications after pancreatic resection remain prevalent. Procedure-related morbidity has previously focused on prevention of pancreatic and biliary fistulas (PFs and BFs) with other complications receiving less attention. We examined morbidity and its impact on reoperation, length of stay (LOS), and mortality following pancreatic resection. We retrospectively reviewed patients having elective pancreatectomy at the University of Tennessee affiliated hospitals during a recent 5-year time period. Factors examined included morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. Patient deaths were analyzed with a focus on antecedent complications. Comparisons were made using Student's t test and chi2 analysis where appropriated. From 1997 to 2003, 125 patients had pancreatic resections: 93 Whipple procedures, 27 distal, and 5 total pancreatectomies. Twenty-nine patients (23%) did not have intraperitoneal drainage (IPD). Resections were performed for cancer in 75 per cent. Seventy complications occurred in 55 patients (44%). Morbidity related to an intra-abdominal process resulted in 16 reoperations and 4/6 deaths in this series (overall mortality, 4.8%). There were no BFs. Of 10 patients with PFs (8%), none required reoperation, and there was no PF-related mortality. No patient without IPD developed a PF. The presence of a PF significantly increased LOS when compared to those without (30.9 +/- 13.1 vs 17.4 +/- 12.2 days, P < 0.01). Forty-four per cent of all complications were related to either intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), hemorrhage, or feeding tube placement (18, 8, and 5, respectively). Management of IAA included percutaneous drainage in 16 and reoperation in 2 with 1 associated death. Hemorrhage necessitated reoperation in 6, resulted in 1 patient death, and was followed by IAA in 2. Of 5 jejunostomy tube complications, 4 required reoperation and 2 patients died. LOS was significantly greater in these 28 patients when compared to all others (28.1 +/- 16.9 vs 15.8 +/- 9.9 days, P < 0.001). Following pancreatectomy, 1) BFs should be a rare event; 2) PFs remain important but are most often managed nonoperatively with few sequelae; 3) in this series, IAA and hemorrhage were more common than PF, frequently mandated reoperation, prolonged hospitalization, and were associated with procedure related mortality; 4) feeding tube complications, though rare, are often catastrophic; 5) future efforts should focus on factors that could reduce abscess formation and a reduction in overall complications--many of which are potentially preventable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15328799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

1.  Tobacco Smoking Associated With Increased Anastomotic Disruption Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Alessandra Landmann; Casey S Butler; Morgan M Bonds; Laura E Fischer; Russell G Postier; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity.

Authors:  Dhruvil R Shah; Richard J Bold; Anthony D Yang; Vijay P Khatri; Steve R Martinez; Robert J Canter
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Malnutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer patients: assessments and interventions for the pancreatic surgeon.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Caitlin E Jones; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  Ann Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2019-03-11

Review 4.  Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; W Shannon Orr; Ben L Zarzaur; Stephen W Behrman
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasound as preoperative assessment of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C W Fristrup; M B Mortensen; T Pless; J Durup; A Ainsworth; C Hovendal; H O Nielsen
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality.

Authors:  Jessica P Simons; Shimul A Shah; Sing Chau Ng; Giles F Whalen; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan.

Authors:  Shuichi Aoki; Hiroaki Miyata; Hiroyuki Konno; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Hiraku Kumamaru; Go Wakabayashi; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Masaki Mori; Yasuyuki Seto; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 7.027

8.  Relative displacement of anastomotic site of pancreato-jejunostomy in pancreatico-duodenectomy: a novel surgical reconstructive technique.

Authors:  Teruyuki Usuba; Toshio Iino; Nobuyoshi Hanyu
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-14

9.  A newly improved POSSUM scoring system for prediction of morbidity in patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhi-Lei Zhang; Lian Chen; Li Peng; Sheng-Chao Li; Peng Guo; Meng Zhang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.