Literature DB >> 25024608

Novel diagnostics for aggravating pancreatic fistulas at the acute phase after pancreatectomy.

Mitsuro Kanda1, Tsutomu Fujii1, Hideki Takami1, Masaya Suenaga1, Yoshikuni Inokawa1, Suguru Yamada1, Daisuke Kobayashi1, Chie Tanaka1, Hiroyuki Sugimoto1, Masahiko Koike1, Shuji Nomoto1, Michitaka Fujiwara1, Yasuhiro Kodera1.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify sensitive predictors of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) at the acute phase after pancreatectomy.
METHODS: This study included 153 patients diagnosed as having POPFs at postoperative day (POD) 3 after either open pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy between January 2008 and March 2013. The POPFs were categorized into three grades based on the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition, and POPFs of grades B or C were considered to be clinically relevant. The predictive performance for the clinically relevant POPF formation of values at PODs 1, 3 and 5 as well as time-dependent changes in levels of inflammatory markers, including white blood cell count, neutrophil count, total lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin level, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and amylase content in the drain fluid were compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariable analyses. A scoring system for the prediction of clinically relevant POPFs was created using five risk factors identified in this study, and its diagnostic performance was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Over time, 77 (50%) of 153 enrolled patients followed a protracted course and were categorized as having clinically relevant POPFs. ROC curve analyses revealed that changes in CRP levels from POD 1 to POD 3 had the greatest area under the curve value (0.767) and that an elevated CRP level of 28.4 mg/L yielded the most optimal predictive value for clinically relevant POPFs. Multivariable analyses for the risk factors of clinically relevant POPFs identified invasive carcinomas of the pancreas and elevation of the CRP level (≥ 28.4 mg/L, from POD 1 to POD 3) as independent diagnostic factors for clinically relevant POPFs (OR 2.94, 95%CI: 1.08-8.55, P = 0.035 and OR 4.82, 95%CI: 1.25-20.2, P = 0.022, respectively). A gradual increase in the prevalence of clinically relevant POPFs in proportion to the risk classification score was confirmed. A highly elevated CRP level and a risk score ≥ 8 were significantly associated with a prolonged duration of drain placement and postoperative hospitalization.
CONCLUSION: A steep rise in the serum CRP level from POD 1 to POD 3 was a highly predictive factor for subsequent clinically relevant POPFs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; Inflammatory marker; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024608      PMCID: PMC4093703          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  33 in total

1.  Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  A Kleespies; M Rentsch; H Seeliger; M Albertsmeier; K-W Jauch; C J Bruns
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Malleo; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Giorgio Talamini; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Management of bleeding from pseudoaneurysms following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hyung Geun Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Kanda; T Fujii; Y Kodera; S Nagai; S Takeda; A Nakao
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A simple risk score to predict in-hospital mortality after pancreatic resection for cancer.

Authors:  Joshua S Hill; Zheng Zhou; Jessica P Simons; Sing Chau Ng; Theodore P McDade; Giles F Whalen; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Persisting elevation of C-reactive protein after pancreatic resections can indicate developing inflammatory complications.

Authors:  Thilo Welsch; Klaus Frommhold; Ulf Hinz; Markus A Weigand; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler; Jan Schmidt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yun-Mee Choe; Keon-Young Lee; Cheong-Ah Oh; Joung-Bum Lee; Sun Keun Choi; Yoon-Seok Hur; Sei-Joong Kim; Young Up Cho; Seung-Ik Ahn; Kee-Chun Hong; Seok-Hwan Shin; Kyung-Rae Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Inflammatory markers in SIRS, sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  I Herzum; H Renz
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Randomized clinical trial of techniques for closure of the pancreatic remnant following distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A Oláh; A Issekutz; T Belágyi; N Hajdú; L Romics
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality.

Authors:  Jessica P Simons; Shimul A Shah; Sing Chau Ng; Giles F Whalen; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  13 in total

1.  Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hattori; Mitsuro Kanda; Hideki Takami; Goro Nakayama; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Predictive value of drain amylase content for peripancreatic inflammatory fluid collections after laparoscopic (assisted) distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Michitaka Fujiwara; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Naoki Iwata; Akira Mizuno; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Usefulness of preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict complications after curative gastrectomy in patients with clinical T2-4 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuri Tanaka; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Akira Mizuno; Naoki Iwata; Masamichi Hayashi; Yukiko Niwa; Hideki Takami; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Tsetsegdemberel Bat-Ulzii Davidson; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

5.  Early Predictive Factors for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Masahiro Fukada; Katsutoshi Murase; Toshiya Higashi; Ryoma Yokoi; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Naoki Okumura; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Takao Takahashi; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-07-03

6.  C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin as Predictors of Postoperative Inflammatory Complications After Pancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  A Giardino; G Spolverato; P Regi; I Frigerio; F Scopelliti; R Girelli; Z Pawlik; P Pederzoli; C Bassi; G Butturini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pancreatic Amylase Value on Postoperative Day 1 After Pancreatic Resection to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Xiongxiong Lu; Xinjing Wang; Yuan Fang; Hao Chen; Chenghong Peng; Hongwei Li; Xiaxing Deng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Oral Food Intake Versus Fasting on Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Yukiyasu Okamura; Kiyoshi Ishigure; Mitsuro Kanda; Shin Takeda; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Combined prognostic nutritional index ratio and serum amylase level during the early postoperative period predicts pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Teruhisa Sakamoto; Takuki Yagyu; Ei Uchinaka; Masaki Morimoto; Takehiko Hanaki; Joji Watanabe; Manabu Yamamoto; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Naruo Tokuyasu; Soichiro Honjo; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Comprehensive Diagnostic Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bo Li; Ning Pu; Qiangda Chen; Yong Mei; Dansong Wang; Dayong Jin; Wenchuan Wu; Lei Zhang; Wenhui Lou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.