Literature DB >> 10769088

Do preoperative biliary stents increase postpancreaticoduodenectomy complications?

T A Sohn1, C J Yeo, J L Cameron, H A Pitt, K D Lillemoe.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the placement of endoscopic or percutaneous biliary stents prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy increases postoperative morbidity. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Patients undergoing preoperative biliary stenting were compared with patients who did not undergo stenting. In addition, outcomes after endoscopic and percutaneous stenting were compared. Patients who had undergone operative biliary bypass prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy were excluded from the analysis. Between January 1994 and December 1997, 567 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior operative biliary bypass. Preoperative biliary stenting was performed in 408 patients (72%), whereas the remaining 159 patients (28%) did not undergo biliary stenting. In the stented group, 64% had stents placed via a percutaneous approach and 36% had stents placed endoscopically. The stented patients were older (mean 63.1 years vs. 61.4 years; P = 0.05) and were more likely to be white (92% vs. 82%; P = 0.005). Those who had stents placed were more likely to have jaundice (67% vs. 38%; P <0.0001) and fever (5% vs. 1%; P = 0.03) as presenting symptoms. There were no differences in multiple intraoperative parameters when the two groups were compared. Patients who had stents placed had a perioperative mortality rate of 1.7% compared to 2.5% in those who did not (P = 0.3). Although the overall complication rates were 35% in those who had stents placed and 30% in those who did not (P = NS), patients with stents experienced a significantly increased incidence of pancreatic fistula (10% vs. 4%; P = 0.02) and wound infection (10% vs. 4%; P = 0.02). The incidences of other postoperative complications were similar between the stented and unstented groups. Eight patients (3%) in the percutaneously stented group developed significant hemobilia after stent placement, whereas none of the patients undergoing endoscopic stent placement developed hemobilia (P = 0.03). There were no statistical differences in other complications between the percutaneously and endoscopically stented groups. Preoperative biliary stenting did not increase the overall complication rate or mortality rate in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Stenting does appear to increase the rate of pancreatic fistula formation, possibly as a result of pancreatic inflammation related to the stenting procedure. Stenting also increases the rate of wound infection, likely secondary to contaminated bile (bactibilia) after instrumentation of the biliary tree. Preoperative biliary stenting is safe but should be used selectively because of the above-mentioned risks. The method of stenting should be based on local expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10769088     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80074-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  30 in total

Review 1.  Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S P Povoski; M S Karpeh; K C Conlon; L H Blumgart; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality.

Authors:  M Trede; G Schwall; H D Saeger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The advantages of bypass operations over radical pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  G Crile
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1970-06

4.  An endogenous source for wound infections based on quantitative bacteriology of the biliary tract.

Authors:  M C Robson; J N Bogart; J P Heggers
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Septic complications and bile cultures in 800 consecutive cholecystectomies.

Authors:  R Reiss; A Eliashiv; A A Deutsch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Does preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage reduce operative risk or increase hospital cost?

Authors:  H A Pitt; A S Gomes; J F Lois; L L Mann; L S Deutsch; W P Longmire
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; H A Pitt; R K Tompkins; L DenBesten; W P Longmire
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  The current status of the Whipple operation for periampullary carcinoma.

Authors:  D W Crist; J L Cameron
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1992

10.  Evaluation of preoperative biliary drainage in the surgical management of pancreatic head carcinoma.

Authors:  N J Lygidakis; M N van der Heyde; M J Lubbers
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec
View more
  68 in total

1.  Preoperative biliary drainage and surgical outcome.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  M W Büchler; C Bassi; A Fingerhut; I Klempa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Influence of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: single centre experience.

Authors:  F Francesco di Mola; Francesca Tavano; R Rita Rago; Antonio De Bonis; M Rosa Valvano; Angelo Andriulli; Pierluigi di Sebastiano
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dawn M Emick; Taylor S Riall; John L Cameron; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Joann Coleman; Patricia K Sauter; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Incidence and management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  Steve M M de Castro; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Olivier R C Busch; Otto M van Delden; Johan S Laméris; Thomas M van Gulik; Hugo Obertop; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Influence of bactibilia after preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative infectious complications.

Authors:  Thomas J Howard; Jian Yu; Ryan B Greene; Virgilio George; George M Wairiuko; Seth A Moore; James A Madura
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  The current standard of care in the periprocedural management of the patient with obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  D L Clarke; Y Pillay; F Anderson; S R Thomson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect?

Authors:  James M Kiely; Attila Nakeeb; Richard A Komorowski; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Tarek Salah; Ahmad Sultan; Mohamed El Hemaly; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Emad Hamdy; Ehab Atef; Ehab El Hanafy; Ahmed El-Geidie; Mohamed Abdel Wahab; Talaat Abdallah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination.

Authors:  Isabelle Sourrouille; Sebastien Gaujoux; Guillaume Lacave; François Bert; Safi Dokmak; Jacques Belghiti; Catherine Paugam-Burtz; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.