Literature DB >> 17016222

Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.

Jason P Long1, Donald L Bartel.   

Abstract

Recent clinical studies have linked failure to surgical variables of stemmed hip resurfacing systems. We used finite element analysis to investigate the effects of implant position, stem orientation, and extent of fixation both on the local stresses and strains associated with implant loosening, neck fracture, and stem fracture, as well as on the load transfer distribution in the bone-implant system. The range of peak stress in the cement was reduced from 11 to 13 MPa for the varus stem to 3.2 to 4.2 MPa for the valgus stem. The range of peak strain in the bone was also reduced from -0.35% to -0.45% strain for the varus stem to -0.19% to -0.27% strain for the valgus stem, but only when reamed cancellous bone remained exposed. Peak stresses in the stem were low for all cases. Additionally, the implant's load transfer distribution was generally insensitive to all variables examined and the femoral head was substantially unloaded. Our data indicate the local stresses and strains associated with implant loosening and neck fracture were reduced by placing the implant in a valgus orientation and covering reamed cancellous bone, but unloading of the femoral head, found for all variables examined, may lead to adverse bone remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016222     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238873.09390.6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  [Imageless computer navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Jochen Nessler; Jürgen Koebke; Joern William Michael; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy.

Authors:  C Schnurr; J W P Michael; P Eysel; D P König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A simple technique for alignment in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: technical note and preliminary report.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Angel Villamor-Pérez
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-06-09

Review 4.  [Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; R Bader; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Radiological validation of a fluoroscopic guided technique for femoral implant positioning during hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Philippe Chiron; Régis Pailhé; Nicolas Reina; David Ancelin; Akash Sharma; Laurent Maubisson; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Use of patient-specific templates in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: experience from sixteen cases.

Authors:  Hao Du; Xiao-xiao Tian; Tong-sen Li; Jin-sheng Yang; Ke-han Li; Guo-xian Pei; Le Xie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Curved-stem hip resurfacing: minimum 20-year followup.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Design of custom-made navigational template of femoral head and pilot research in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jinlong Liang; Yonghui Zhao; Xinjian Gao; Xuewei Fang; Yongqing Xu; Sheng Lu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Stress fracture of femoral stem of hip resurfacing a cause of sudden onset hip pain- A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Hemanta Das; Tahawwar Minhas; Rohit Rambani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.