BACKGROUND: EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors confer clinical benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer when combined with chemotherapy. An emerging strategy to improve outcomes in rectal cancer is to integrate biologically active, targeted agents as triple therapy into chemoradiation protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cetuximab and bevacizumab have now been incorporated into phase I-II studies of preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. The rationale of these combinations, early efficacy and toxicity data, and possible molecular predictors for tumor response are reviewed. Computerized bibliographic searches of Pubmed were supplemented with hand searches of reference lists and abstracts of ASCO and ASTRO meetings. RESULTS: The combination of cetuximab and CRT can be safely applied without dose compromises of the respective treatment components. Disappointingly low rates of pathologic complete remission have been noted in several phase II studies. The K-ras mutation status and the gene copy number of EGFR may predict tumor response. The toxicity pattern (radiation-induced enteritis, perforations) and surgical complications (wound healing, fistula, bleeding) observed in at least some of the clinical studies with bevacizumab and CRT warrant further investigations. CONCLUSION: Longer follow-up (and, finally, randomized trials) is needed to draw any firm conclusions with respect to local and distant failure rates, and toxicity associated with these novel treatment approaches.
BACKGROUND:EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors confer clinical benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer when combined with chemotherapy. An emerging strategy to improve outcomes in rectal cancer is to integrate biologically active, targeted agents as triple therapy into chemoradiation protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Cetuximab and bevacizumab have now been incorporated into phase I-II studies of preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. The rationale of these combinations, early efficacy and toxicity data, and possible molecular predictors for tumor response are reviewed. Computerized bibliographic searches of Pubmed were supplemented with hand searches of reference lists and abstracts of ASCO and ASTRO meetings. RESULTS: The combination of cetuximab and CRT can be safely applied without dose compromises of the respective treatment components. Disappointingly low rates of pathologic complete remission have been noted in several phase II studies. The K-ras mutation status and the gene copy number of EGFR may predict tumor response. The toxicity pattern (radiation-induced enteritis, perforations) and surgical complications (wound healing, fistula, bleeding) observed in at least some of the clinical studies with bevacizumab and CRT warrant further investigations. CONCLUSION: Longer follow-up (and, finally, randomized trials) is needed to draw any firm conclusions with respect to local and distant failure rates, and toxicity associated with these novel treatment approaches.
Authors: J-P Machiels; C Sempoux; P Scalliet; J-C Coche; Y Humblet; E Van Cutsem; J Kerger; J-L Canon; M Peeters; S Aydin; S Laurent; A Kartheuser; B Coster; S Roels; J-F Daisne; B Honhon; L Duck; C Kirkove; M-A Bonny; K Haustermans Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-01-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: C G Lee; M Heijn; E di Tomaso; G Griffon-Etienne; M Ancukiewicz; C Koike; K R Park; N Ferrara; R K Jain; H D Suit; Y Boucher Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C Bengala; S Bettelli; F Bertolini; S Salvi; S Chiara; C Sonaglio; L Losi; N Bigiani; G Sartori; C Dealis; N Malavasi; R D'Amico; G Luppi; B Gatteschi; A Maiorana; P F Conte Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-01-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Reinhard Kopp; Elisabeth Rothbauer; Elisabeth Mueller; Friedrich Wilhelm Schildberg; Karl-Walter Jauch; Andreas Pfeiffer Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: M P Morelli; T Cascone; T Troiani; F De Vita; M Orditura; G Laus; S G Eckhardt; S Pepe; G Tortora; F Ciardiello Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Frank Michael Klenke; Amir Abdollahi; Marc Bischof; Martha-Maria Gebhard; Volker Ewerbeck; Peter E Huber; Axel Sckell Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Steffen Hennies; Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Margret Rave-Fränk; David Eickelmann; Patricia Virsik; Klaus Jung; Markus Schirmer; Michael Ghadimi; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Robert Michael Hermann; Hans Christiansen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: J Dvorak; V Sitorova; A Ryska; I Sirak; I Richter; J Hatlova; A Ferko; B Melichar; J Petera Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Andreas Dietz; Andreas Boehm; Iris-Susanne Horn; Pierre Kruber; Ingo Bechmann; Wojciech Golusinski; Dietger Niederwieser; Ralph Dollner; Torsten W Remmerbach; Christian Wittekind; Stephan Dietzsch; Guido Hildebrandt; Gunnar Wichmann Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 2.503