J Winkler1, L Zipp, J Knoblich, F Zimmermann. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phase II trials of neoadjuvant treatment in UICC-TNM stage II and III rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated favourable rates on tumour regression with acceptable toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 34 patients treated from 2005-2008 outside clinical trials (CTR) with neoadjuvant irradiation (45-50.4 Gy) and simultaneous capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and 22-35 and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 (CAPOX). Twenty-six (77%) patients received one or two courses of capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 (XELOX) prior to simultaneous chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: UICC-TNM stage regression was observed in 60% (n = 20). Dworak's regression grades 3 and 4 were achieved in 18.2% (n = 6) and 15.1% (n = 5) of the patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 53% (n = 8) of patients with a tumour of the lower rectum. Within the mean observation of 24 months, none of the patients relapsed locally, 1 patient had progressive disease and 5 patients (15%) relapsed distantly. Toxicity of grade 3 and 4 was mainly diarrhoea 18% (n = 6) and perianal pain 9% (n = 3). Nevertheless, severe cardiac events (n = 2), severe electrolyte disturbances (n = 2), and syncopes (n = 2) were observed as well. CONCLUSION: Treatment efficacy and common toxicity are similar to the reports of phase I/II trials. However, several severe adverse events were observed in our cohort study. The predisposing factors for these events have yet to be studied and may have implications for the selection of patients outside CTR.
BACKGROUND: Phase II trials of neoadjuvant treatment in UICC-TNM stage II and III rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated favourable rates on tumour regression with acceptable toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 34 patients treated from 2005-2008 outside clinical trials (CTR) with neoadjuvant irradiation (45-50.4 Gy) and simultaneous capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and 22-35 and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 (CAPOX). Twenty-six (77%) patients received one or two courses of capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 (XELOX) prior to simultaneous chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: UICC-TNM stage regression was observed in 60% (n = 20). Dworak's regression grades 3 and 4 were achieved in 18.2% (n = 6) and 15.1% (n = 5) of the patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 53% (n = 8) of patients with a tumour of the lower rectum. Within the mean observation of 24 months, none of the patients relapsed locally, 1 patient had progressive disease and 5 patients (15%) relapsed distantly. Toxicity of grade 3 and 4 was mainly diarrhoea 18% (n = 6) and perianal pain 9% (n = 3). Nevertheless, severe cardiac events (n = 2), severe electrolyte disturbances (n = 2), and syncopes (n = 2) were observed as well. CONCLUSION: Treatment efficacy and common toxicity are similar to the reports of phase I/II trials. However, several severe adverse events were observed in our cohort study. The predisposing factors for these events have yet to be studied and may have implications for the selection of patients outside CTR.
Authors: E Van Cutsem; C Twelves; J Cassidy; D Allman; E Bajetta; M Boyer; R Bugat; M Findlay; S Frings; M Jahn; J McKendrick; B Osterwalder; G Perez-Manga; R Rosso; P Rougier; W H Schmiegel; J F Seitz; P Thompson; J M Vieitez; C Weitzel; P Harper Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Steffen Hennies; Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Margret Rave-Fränk; David Eickelmann; Patricia Virsik; Klaus Jung; Markus Schirmer; Michael Ghadimi; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Robert Michael Hermann; Hans Christiansen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: J-P Machiels; L Duck; B Honhon; B Coster; J-C Coche; P Scalliet; Y Humblet; S Aydin; J Kerger; V Remouchamps; J-L Canon; P Van Maele; L Gilbeau; S Laurent; C Kirkove; M Octave-Prignot; J-F Baurain; A Kartheuser; C Sempoux Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-10-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: U Küchenmeister; R Kirchner; J Mellert; G Klautke; R Mücke; U T Hopt; R Fietkau Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Y L B Klaver; V E P P Lemmens; S W Nienhuijs; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; H J T Rutten; I H J T de Hingh Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: K Fakhrian; A D Ordu; B Haller; J Theisen; F Lordick; V Bišof; M Molls; H Geinitz Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Jemma Bhoday; Nicholas J Battersby; Manish Chand; Nicholas P West; Al-Mutaz Abulafi; Paris P Tekkis; Gina Brown Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Kathrin Dellas; Thomas Höhler; Thomas Reese; Florian Würschmidt; Erik Engel; Claus Rödel; Wolfgang Wagner; Michael Richter; Dirk Arnold; Jürgen Dunst Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Nam P Nguyen; Misty Ceizyk; Jacqueline Vock; Paul Vos; Alexander Chi; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Judy Pugh; Rihan Khan; Christina Truong; Gabby Albala; Angela Locke; Ulf Karlsson; Steve Gelumbauskas; Lexie Smith-Raymond Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240