PURPOSE: To date, no valid imaging modality exists for early response prediction to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in carcinoembryonic-antigen-(CEA)-expressing rectal cancers (UICC stages II and III). It is hypothesized that the uptake of an anti-CEA antibody is directly related to the number of viable tumor cells and may be quantified by immuno-positron emission tomography (immuno-PET). Therefore, we evaluated a novel pretargeting system using TF2, a humanized bispecific trivalent monoclonal antibody (mAb), directed against CEA and the IMP-288-peptide, a hapten for binding radiometals for imaging. Uptake and kinetics of the pretargeting system were investigated in vitro prior to and after irradiation. METHODS: TF2 was labeled with ¹³¹I and IMP-288 with ¹¹¹InCl₃. The colorectal cancer cell lines HT29, SW480, and T84 with known varying CEA expression were incubated (≤ 72 hours) with ¹³¹I-TF2 or the TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 pretargeting system. Parallel cultures were irradiated with 2-10 Gy high-energy photons. Tracer uptake, proliferation, apoptosis, and CEA-RNA expression of cancer cells were investigated. RESULTS: The uptake of tracers was dependent on CEA expression and cell count of the cell lines (uptake/10⁶ cells: 0.3% in HT29, 1.5% in SW480, and 14% in T84, p < 0.001). The TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 pretargeting system showed a higher uptake after 4 and 72 hours compared to (131)I-TF2 in parallel cultures. Only in one cell line (SW480) an increased apoptosis after irradiation could be detected. Irradiation increased dose dependently both the specific uptake of ¹³¹I-TF2 and of the TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 system (4-fold in HT29 and T84 after 10 Gy (72 hours), p < 0.001). These results were CEA-mRNA independent. CONCLUSION: This novel pretargeting system allows the quantitative analysis of CEA-expressing colorectal cancer cells and represents a promising tool for evaluation of tumor cell viability after irradiation.
PURPOSE: To date, no valid imaging modality exists for early response prediction to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in carcinoembryonic-antigen-(CEA)-expressing rectal cancers (UICC stages II and III). It is hypothesized that the uptake of an anti-CEA antibody is directly related to the number of viable tumor cells and may be quantified by immuno-positron emission tomography (immuno-PET). Therefore, we evaluated a novel pretargeting system using TF2, a humanized bispecific trivalent monoclonal antibody (mAb), directed against CEA and the IMP-288-peptide, a hapten for binding radiometals for imaging. Uptake and kinetics of the pretargeting system were investigated in vitro prior to and after irradiation. METHODS: TF2 was labeled with ¹³¹I and IMP-288 with ¹¹¹InCl₃. The colorectal cancer cell lines HT29, SW480, and T84 with known varying CEA expression were incubated (≤ 72 hours) with ¹³¹I-TF2 or the TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 pretargeting system. Parallel cultures were irradiated with 2-10 Gy high-energy photons. Tracer uptake, proliferation, apoptosis, and CEA-RNA expression of cancer cells were investigated. RESULTS: The uptake of tracers was dependent on CEA expression and cell count of the cell lines (uptake/10⁶ cells: 0.3% in HT29, 1.5% in SW480, and 14% in T84, p < 0.001). The TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 pretargeting system showed a higher uptake after 4 and 72 hours compared to (131)I-TF2 in parallel cultures. Only in one cell line (SW480) an increased apoptosis after irradiation could be detected. Irradiation increased dose dependently both the specific uptake of ¹³¹I-TF2 and of the TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 system (4-fold in HT29 and T84 after 10 Gy (72 hours), p < 0.001). These results were CEA-mRNA independent. CONCLUSION: This novel pretargeting system allows the quantitative analysis of CEA-expressing colorectal cancer cells and represents a promising tool for evaluation of tumor cell viability after irradiation.
Authors: T Yamamoto; S Nishizawa; I Maruyama; M Yoshida; T Tsuchida; A Waki; Y Fujibayashi; T Kubota; Y Yonekura; H Itoh Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: R Sauer; R Fietkau; C Wittekind; P Martus; C Rödel; W Hohenberger; G Jatzko; H Sabitzer; J H Karstens; H Becker; C Hess; R Raab Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: T Liersch; C Langer; C Jakob; D Müller; B M Ghadimi; A Siemer; P M Markus; L Füzesi; H Becker Journal: Chirurg Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Max J Lahaye; Sanne M E Engelen; Alfons G H Kessels; Adriaan P de Bruïne; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ingrid J G Burvenich; Sagun Parakh; Adam C Parslow; Sze Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; Andrew M Scott Journal: AAPS J Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 4.009