Literature DB >> 19504106

MR-lymphangiography at 3.0 T--a feasibility study.

Mike Notohamiprodjo1, Ruediger G H Baumeister, Tobias F Jakobs, Kerstin U Bauner, Holger F Boehm, Annie Horng, Maximilian F Reiser, Christian Glaser, Karin A Herrmann.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish and evaluate contrast-enhanced MR-lymphangiography (MRL) at 3.0 T for detection and visualization of abnormalities of the peripheral lymphatic system. Sixteen patients were examined with a highly resolved isotropic T1w-3D-GRE-(FLASH) sequence (TR 3.76 ms/TE 1.45 ms/FA 30 degrees /voxel-size 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 mm(3)) at 3T after intracutaneous injection of gadolinium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic-acid. Two radiologists evaluated overall image quality, contrast between lymph vessels and background tissue, venous contamination, visualized levels, and fat-saturation-homogeneity on 3D maximum-intensity projections. Overall image quality was good to excellent, and all examinations were diagnostic except one, where contrast medium was injected subcutaneously instead of intracutaneously. Overall image quality was good to excellent in 12/16 cases, depiction of lymph vessels was good to excellent in 15/16 cases. Venous contamination was always present, but diagnostically problematical in only one case. Instant lymphatic drainage was observed in unaffected extremities, reaching the pelvic level after approximately 10 min. Lymphatic drainage was considerably delayed in lymphedematous extremities. Ectatic lymph vessels, entrapment, and diffuse drainage of contrast medium correlated with impaired lymphatic drainage. In conclusion, MRL at 3.0 T provides very high spatial resolution and anatomical detail of normal and abnormal peripheral lymph vessels. MRL may thus become a valuable tool for microsurgical treatment planning and monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19504106     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1461-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

Review 1.  Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: safety update.

Authors:  Miles A Kirchin; Val M Runge
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-10

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  [Planning and monitoring of autologous lymph vessel transplantation by means of nuclear medicine lymphoscintigraphy].

Authors:  M Weiss; R G H Baumeister; K Hahn
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.018

4.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Henrik J Michaely; Volker Matschl; Peter Schmitt; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Interstitial MR lymphography with gadoterate meglumine: initial experience in humans.

Authors:  S G Ruehm; T Schroeder; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MR lymphangiography for the assessment of the lymphatic system in patients undergoing microsurgical reconstructions of lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Christian Lohrmann; Gunther Felmerer; Etelka Foeldi; J-P Bartholomä; Mathias Langer
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.514

Review 8.  Preclinical safety assessment and pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide injection, a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent.

Authors:  E S Harpur; D Worah; P A Hals; E Holtz; K Furuhama; H Nomura
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Uniform fat suppression in hands and feet through the use of two-point Dixon chemical shift MR imaging.

Authors:  M Maas; P F Dijkstra; E M Akkerman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Dynamic lymph flow imaging in patients with oedema of the lower limb for evaluation of the functional outcome after autologous lymph vessel transplantation: an 8-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Mayo Weiss; Rüdiger G H Baumeister; Klaus Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  10 in total

1.  High-resolution MR lymphangiography for planning lymphaticovenous anastomosis treatment: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Francesco Gentili; Francesco Giuseppe Mazzei; Paolo Gennaro; Duccio Guerrieri; Andrea Nigri; Guido Gabriele; Elisabetta Weber; Alfonso Fausto; Giuseppe Botta; Luca Volterrani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Quantitative and morphologic change associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Comparison of 3.0T MRI to external measures.

Authors:  Gregory C Gardner; Joshua P Nickerson; Richard Watts; Lee Nelson; Kim L Dittus; Patricia J O'Brien
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.589

3.  Seven-Tesla micro-MRI in early detection of acute arterial ischaemia: evolution of findings in an in vivo rat model.

Authors:  D Berritto; F Somma; N Landi; C Cavaliere; M Corona; S Russo; F Fulciniti; S Cappabianca; A Rotondo; R Grassi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Imaging of the Lymphatic Vessels for Surgical Planning: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saskia van Heumen; Jonas J M Riksen; Wichor M Bramer; Gijs van Soest; Dalibor Vasilic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Technical note: MRI lymphangiography of the lower limb in secondary lymphedema.

Authors:  Ravindra B Kamble; Roshan Shetty; N Diwakar; G Madhusudan
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2011-01

6.  Imaging lymphatic system in breast cancer patients with magnetic resonance lymphangiography.

Authors:  Qing Lu; Jia Hua; Mohammad M Kassir; Zachary Delproposto; Yongming Dai; Jingyi Sun; Mark Haacke; Jiani Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Anatomic and Functional Evaluation of Central Lymphatics With Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Hye Sun Hwang; Ho Yun Lee; Jong Ho Cho; Hong Kwan Kim; Kyung Soo Lee; Young Mog Shim; Jaeil Zo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  MR Lymphangiography: A Practical Guide to Perform It and a Brief Review of the Literature from a Technical Point of View.

Authors:  Francesco Giuseppe Mazzei; Francesco Gentili; Susanna Guerrini; Nevada Cioffi Squitieri; Duccio Guerrieri; Paolo Gennaro; Michele Scialpi; Luca Volterrani; Maria Antonietta Mazzei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Inhibition of VEGF-C modulates distal lymphatic remodeling and secondary metastasis.

Authors:  Alvin Gogineni; Maresa Caunt; Ailey Crow; Chingwei V Lee; Germaine Fuh; Nicholas van Bruggen; Weilan Ye; Robby M Weimer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Systematic Review of Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography From a Technical Perspective.

Authors:  Michael Mills; Malou van Zanten; Marco Borri; Peter S Mortimer; Kristiana Gordon; Pia Ostergaard; Franklyn A Howe
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.813

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.