UNLABELLED: Abstract Introduction: Lymphedema is a chronic disease of increasing importance to cancer survivors. A tape measurement tool used for lymphedema relies on indirect volume calculations based on external circumference, which may not reflect the true extent of abnormal fluid accumulation accurately. Fluid-sensitive MRI sequences may be able to delineate the severity of this condition more precisely and thus also monitor response to therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients being followed by physical therapy for clinically diagnosed breast cancer-related lymphedema were recruited to participate in this study. External measurements and upper extremity MRI were performed on all subjects. Arm circumference, arm volume, and lymphedema volumes were calculated for each method. MR imaging detected lymphedema in all study subjects. Correlation was found between external circumferential measurements and with the 3.0T MRI (r=0.9368). There was poor correlation between lymphedema volumes calculated from clinical measurements and MR imaging (r=0.5539). CONCLUSIONS: External measurements were not found to be an accurate measure of lymphedema volume associated with breast cancer lymphedema. MRI is a reliable means to obtain upper extremity circumferential and volume measurements. MRI is able to evaluate morphologic change associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphedema research requires integrated use of tools to further describe the disease process over time, quantitate the distribution of tissue changes, and improve the sensitivity and specificity of the measurements.
UNLABELLED: Abstract Introduction: Lymphedema is a chronic disease of increasing importance to cancer survivors. A tape measurement tool used for lymphedema relies on indirect volume calculations based on external circumference, which may not reflect the true extent of abnormal fluid accumulation accurately. Fluid-sensitive MRI sequences may be able to delineate the severity of this condition more precisely and thus also monitor response to therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients being followed by physical therapy for clinically diagnosed breast cancer-related lymphedema were recruited to participate in this study. External measurements and upper extremity MRI were performed on all subjects. Arm circumference, arm volume, and lymphedema volumes were calculated for each method. MR imaging detected lymphedema in all study subjects. Correlation was found between external circumferential measurements and with the 3.0T MRI (r=0.9368). There was poor correlation between lymphedema volumes calculated from clinical measurements and MR imaging (r=0.5539). CONCLUSIONS: External measurements were not found to be an accurate measure of lymphedema volume associated with breast cancer lymphedema. MRI is a reliable means to obtain upper extremity circumferential and volume measurements. MRI is able to evaluate morphologic change associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphedema research requires integrated use of tools to further describe the disease process over time, quantitate the distribution of tissue changes, and improve the sensitivity and specificity of the measurements.
Authors: Russell H Mellor; Nigel L Bush; Anthony W B Stanton; Jeff C Bamber; J Rodney Levick; Peter S Mortimer Journal: Breast J Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Emma C Starritt; David Joseph; J Gregory McKinnon; Sing Kai Lo; Johannes H W de Wilt; John F Thompson Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: J S Rietman; P U Dijkstra; H J Hoekstra; W H Eisma; B G Szabo; J W Groothoff; J H B Geertzen Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Andrea L Cheville; Charles L McGarvey; Jeanne A Petrek; Sandra A Russo; Saskia R J Thiadens; Marie E Taylor Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: E Paci; A Cariddi; A Barchielli; S Bianchi; G Cardona; V Distante; D Giorgi; P Pacini; M Zappa; M R Del Turco Journal: Tumori Date: 1996 Jul-Aug
Authors: Marco Borri; Kristiana D Gordon; Julie C Hughes; Erica D Scurr; Dow-Mu Koh; Martin O Leach; Peter S Mortimer; Maria A Schmidt Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Steven R Horbal; Sung-Yu Chu; Nicholas C Wang; Wen-Hui Chan; Yen-Ling Huang; Edward Brown; Sven A Holcombe; Paul S Cederna; Stewart C Wang; Ming-Huei Cheng Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-10-29
Authors: Mona M Al Onazi; Kristin L Campbell; Richard B Thompson; Sunita Ghosh; John R Mackey; Anne Muir; Margaret L McNeely Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 2.692