Literature DB >> 19487710

Short-term hormone therapy suspension and mammography recall: a randomized trial.

Diana S M Buist1, Melissa L Anderson, Susan D Reed, Erin J Aiello Bowles, E Dawn Fitzgibbons, Juleann C Gandara, Deborah Seger, Katherine M Newton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Without population-based evidence, some clinicians recommend short-term suspension of hormone therapy to improve the performance of mammography. Hormone therapy increases breast density, and abnormal screening mammograms are more common among women with denser breasts and among women using hormone therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether 1 to 2 months of hormone therapy suspension before screening mammography decreases additional mammographic imaging (recall) in women age 45 to 80 years.
DESIGN: 3-group randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Integrated health plan in western Washington from 2004 to 2007. PATIENTS: 1704 women age 45 to 80 years who used hormone therapy at their most recent screening (index) mammography, were due for screening (study) mammography, and were still using hormone therapy. INTERVENTION: Block random assignment (by breast density and hormone therapy type) to no hormone therapy suspension (n = 567) or suspension for 1 month (n = 570) or 2 months (n = 567) before study mammography. One blinded expert radiologist interpreted all mammograms. MEASUREMENTS: Recall was the primary outcome, and change in mammographic breast density (percentage and dense area) between the index and study mammograms was the secondary outcome.
RESULTS: Mammography recall rates were 11.3% (61 of 542 women in the no-suspension group), 12.3% (50 of 478 women in the 1-month suspension group), and 9.8% (44 of 451 women in the 2-month suspension group). No subgroups were identified in which brief suspension of hormone therapy resulted in decreased mammography recall. With suspension, decreases in percentage of breast density were orderly and statistically significant: 0.1% (no-suspension group), -0.9% (1-month suspension group), and -1.5% (2-month suspension group). Similar ordered decreases were observed for dense area. Women in the suspension groups experienced increased menopause symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Results can only be generalized to women age 45 to 80 years who have used hormone therapy for at least 1 year and will consider short-term suspension; most eligible women (61%) declined participation. Mammography recall was determined by 1 expert radiologist.
CONCLUSION: Brief hormone therapy suspension was associated with small changes in breast density and did not affect recall rates. No evidence supports short-term hormone therapy suspension before mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487710      PMCID: PMC2803099          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  52 in total

1.  A new conjugated estrogen.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Lett Drugs Ther       Date:  1999-07-30       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Impact of hormone therapy on false-positive recall and costs among women undergoing screening mammography.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Diana S M Buist; Carolyn M Rutter; Paul A Fishman; Kevin R Beverly; Stephen Taplin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography.

Authors:  L Ma; E Fishell; B Wright; W Hanna; S Allan; N F Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Invited commentary: assessing breast density change--lessons for future studies.

Authors:  Celia Byrne
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; J W Byng; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The effect of low dose hormone therapy on mammographic breast density.

Authors:  George E Christodoulakos; Irene V Lambrinoudaki; Athina D Vourtsi; Sofia Vlachou; Maria Creatsa; Konstantinos P C Panoulis; Dimitrios Botsis
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Hormone therapy prescribing patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Katherine M Newton; Diana L Miglioretti; Kevin Beverly; Maureen T Connelly; Susan Andrade; Cynthia L Hartsfield; Feifei Wei; K Arnold Chan; Larry Kessler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Pamela M Vacek; Joan Skelly; Donald L Weaver; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; V Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Kathy R Brandt; Alice Wang; Carol Janney; Zachary S Fredericksen; James R Cerhan; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.

Authors:  M B Laya; E B Larson; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  12 in total

1.  Predictors of breast density change after hormone therapy cessation: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sarah J Lowry; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Progesterone receptors (PR) mediate STAT actions: PR and prolactin receptor signaling crosstalk in breast cancer models.

Authors:  Katherine A Leehy; Thu H Truong; Laura J Mauro; Carol A Lange
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 4.292

3.  Factors associated with successful discontinuation of hormone therapy.

Authors:  Katherine M Newton; Susan D Reed; Larissa Nekhyludov; Louis C Grothaus; Evette J Ludman; Kelly Ehrlich; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Mammographic breast density and tolerance for short-term postmenopausal hormone therapy suspension.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Susan D Reed; Katherine M Newton; E Dawn Fitzgibbons; Deborah Seger; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Immigration history, lifestyle characteristics, and breast density in the Vietnamese American Women's Health Study: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; Namphuong Doanvo; MiHee Lee; Zayar Soe; Alice W Lee; Cam Van Doan; Dennis Deapen; Giske Ursin; Darcy Spicer; Peggy Reynolds; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Sleep problems after short-term hormone therapy suspension: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sarah E Tom; Melissa L Anderson; Carol A Landis; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Nancy F Woods; Susan D Reed; Katherine M Newton; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a U.S. healthcare system.

Authors:  Rachel L Winer; Jasmin A Tiro; Diana L Miglioretti; Chris Thayer; Tara Beatty; John Lin; Hongyuan Gao; Kilian Kimbel; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Hormone and receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) pathway gene expression in plasma and mammographic breast density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Rachel Mintz; Mei Wang; Shuai Xu; Graham A Colditz; Chris Markovic; Adetunji T Toriola
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Circulating serum xenoestrogens and mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Curtis J Hedman; Jue Wang; Jocelyn Dc Hemming; John M Hampton; Diana Sm Buist; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Gale S Sisney; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Hormone metabolism pathway genes and mammographic density change after quitting estrogen and progestin combined hormone therapy in the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; Jianning Luo; Yu-Chen Su; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Fredrick R Schumacher; David Van Den Berg; Anna H Wu; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 8.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.