Literature DB >> 19486872

Preventing loss of domain: a management strategy for closure of the "open abdomen" during the initial hospitalization.

Wega Koss1, Hao C Ho, Mihae Yu, Kurt Edwards, Mona Ghows, Andrew Tan, Danny M Takanishi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the management of the abdominal compartment syndrome resulting in an open abdomen, the so-called "planned ventral hernia" is considered an acceptable outcome. We describe a technique of surgical management of the abdominal wound that allows fascial closure in most cases during the initial admission.
METHODS: Consecutive trauma patients with abdominal compartment syndrome managed with an open abdomen over a 3-year period were identified. Medical records and the trauma data registry were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, operative treatment, timing and type of wound management, closure of the abdomen, and outcome.
RESULTS: From January 2004 to January 2007, 23 patients underwent management with an open abdomen. The mechanism of injury was blunt in 83% of patients and penetrating in 17%. All 18 survivors underwent primary fascial closure of the abdomen using a vacuum- and tie-assisted technique of wound closure. The mean time to closure was 11 +/- 4.4 days (range, 4-18 days). In all, 9 complications occurred in 7 patients, which included 1 reoperation for abscess after fascial closure. There was no dehiscence and no fistula. The Apache II score was 19.3 +/- 6.9 (range, 7-30), and the injury severity score was 32.3 + 10.6 (range, 9-50).
CONCLUSIONS: A technique of managing the open abdomen that prevents fascial retraction results in a high primary closure rate with an acceptable rate of short-term complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19486872     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  6 in total

Review 1.  EHS clinical guidelines on the management of the abdominal wall in the context of the open or burst abdomen.

Authors:  M López-Cano; J M García-Alamino; S A Antoniou; D Bennet; U A Dietz; F Ferreira; R H Fortelny; P Hernandez-Granados; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; J A Pereira; R Schwab; N Slater; A Vanlander; G H Van Ramshorst; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Management of the open abdomen using vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction.

Authors:  A Willms; C Güsgen; S Schaaf; D Bieler; M von Websky; R Schwab
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Open Abdomen Treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Indications, Management and Survival.

Authors:  A Seternes; L C Rekstad; S Mo; P Klepstad; D L Halvorsen; T Dahl; M Björck; A Wibe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  One-year follow-up after open abdomen therapy with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction.

Authors:  Thordur Bjarnason; A Montgomery; O Ekberg; S Acosta; M Svensson; A Wanhainen; M Björck; U Petersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Use of a furosemide drip does not improve earlier primary fascial closure in the open abdomen.

Authors:  Leland H Webb; Mayur B Patel; Marcus J Dortch; Richard S Miller; Oliver L Gunter; Bryan R Collier
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2012-04

6.  Delayed primary closure of the septic open abdomen with a dynamic closure system.

Authors:  Froukje J Verdam; Dennis E J G J Dolmans; Maarten J Loos; Menno H Raber; Ralph J de Wit; Jan A Charbon; Jos P A M Vroemen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.