Literature DB >> 27541031

Open Abdomen Treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Indications, Management and Survival.

A Seternes1,2,3, L C Rekstad4, S Mo5, P Klepstad5,6, D L Halvorsen7, T Dahl8,6, M Björck9, A Wibe4,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open abdomen treatment (OAT) is a significant burden for patients and is associated with considerable mortality. The primary aim of this study was to report survival and cause of mortality after OAT. Secondary aims were to evaluate length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital, time to abdominal closure and major complications.
METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively registered patients undergoing OAT between October 2006 and June 2014 at Trondheim University Hospital, Norway.
RESULTS: The 118 patients with OAT had a median age of 63 (20-88) years. OAT indications were abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) (n = 53), prophylactic (n = 29), abdominal contamination/second look laparotomy (n = 22), necrotizing fasciitis (n = 7), hemorrhage packing (n = 4) and full-thickness wound dehiscence (n = 3). Eight percent were trauma patients. Vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAWC) with mesh-mediated traction (VAWCM) was used in 92 (78 %) patients, the remaining 26 (22 %) had VAWC only. Per-protocol primary fascial closure rate was 84 %. Median time to abdominal closure was 12 days (1-143). LOS in the ICU was 15 (1-89), and in hospital 29 (1-246) days. Eighty-one (68 %) patients survived the hospital stay. Renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) (OR 3.9, 95 % CI 1.37-11.11), ACS (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.19-8.29) and advanced age (OR 1.045, 95 % CI 1.004-1.088) were independent predictors of mortality in multivariate analysis. The nine patients with an entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF) survived.
CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of the patients treated with OAT survived. Renal failure with RRT, ACS and advanced age were predictors of mortality, whereas EAF was not associated with increased mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27541031     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3694-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  49 in total

1.  Temporary intravenous bag silo closure in severe abdominal trauma.

Authors:  L Fernandez; S Norwood; R Roettger; H E Wilkins
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1996-02

2.  Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) for planned relaparotomy (etappenlavage) in trauma.

Authors:  C Aprahamian; D H Wittmann; J M Bergstein; E J Quebbeman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1990-06

3.  Abdominal hypertension and decompression: the effect on peritoneal metabolism in an experimental porcine study.

Authors:  P Skoog; T M Hörer; K F Nilsson; L Norgren; T Larzon; K Jansson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: a prospective observational American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

Authors:  Joseph J Dubose; Thomas M Scalea; John B Holcomb; Binod Shrestha; Obi Okoye; Kenji Inaba; Tiffany K Bee; Timothy C Fabian; James Whelan; Rao R Ivatury
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; M A Boermeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction.

Authors:  S Acosta; T Bjarnason; U Petersson; B Pålsson; A Wanhainen; M Svensson; K Djavani; M Björck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration.

Authors:  I L Kron; P K Harman; S P Nolan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Outcomes in surgical versus medical patients with the secondary abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  C Clay Cothren; Ernest E Moore; Jeffrey L Johnson; John B Moore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis.

Authors:  Daniel Perez; Stefan Wildi; Nicolas Demartines; Matthias Bramkamp; Christian Koehler; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome--a critical analysis.

Authors:  Jan J De Waele; Eric Aj Hoste; Manu Lng Malbrain
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  8 in total

1.  Acute Kidney Injury Following Exploratory Laparotomy and Temporary Abdominal Closure.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Azra Bihorac; Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti; Janeen R Jordan; Chasen A Croft; Robert Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Dynamic closure techniques for treatment of an open abdomen: an update.

Authors:  N Poortmans; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Ke Wang; Junhua Gong; Zuojin Liu; Jianping Gong; Zhong Zeng; Xiaomei Wang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Management of the open abdomen using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in severe abdominal sepsis: A review of 48 cases in Hospital Mexico, Costa Rica.

Authors:  Pablo Sibaja; Alfredo Sanchez; Guillermo Villegas; Alvaro Apestegui; Esteban Mora
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-17

5.  Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure with Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Better Outcomes than Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Alone: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Salamone; Leo Licari; Giovanni Guercio; Albert Comelli; Mirko Mangiapane; Nicolò Falco; Roberta Tutino; Noemi Bagarella; Sofia Campanella; Calogero Porrello; Roberto Gullo; Gianfranco Cocorullo; Gaspare Gulotta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation in the Septic Open Abdomen Utilizing a Modified Negative Pressure Therapy System.

Authors:  Pablo Sibaja Alvarez; Alfredo Sánchez Betancourt; Luis G Fernández
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-10

7.  Chinese Trauma Surgeon Association for management guidelines of vacuum sealing drainage application in abdominal surgeries-Update and systematic review.

Authors:  Yang Li; Pei-Yuan Li; Shi-Jing Sun; Yuan-Zhang Yao; Zhan-Fei Li; Tao Liu; Fan Yang; Lian-Yang Zhang; Xiang-Jun Bai; Jing-Shan Huo; Wu-Bing He; Jun Ouyang; Lei Peng; Ping Hu; Yan-An Zhu; Ping Jin; Qi-Feng Shao; Yan-Feng Wang; Rui-Wu Dai; Pei-Yang Hu; Hai-Ming Chen; Ge-Fei Wang; Yong-Gao Wang; Hong-Xu Jin; Chang-Ju Zhu; Qi-Yong Zhang; Biao Shao; Xi-Guang Sang; Chang-Lin Yin
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-14

Review 8.  Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Improving Outcomes With A Multidisciplinary Approach - A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Martin Padar; Annika Reintam Blaser; Peep Talving; Edgar Lipping; Joel Starkopf
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2019-12-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.