Literature DB >> 19484467

Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations.

Simon Lacey1, Marisa Pappas, Alexandra Kreps, Kevin Lee, K Sathian.   

Abstract

We previously showed that cross-modal recognition of unfamiliar objects is view-independent, in contrast to view-dependence within-modally, in both vision and haptics. Does the view-independent, bisensory representation underlying cross-modal recognition arise from integration of unisensory, view-dependent representations or intermediate, unisensory but view-independent representations? Two psychophysical experiments sought to distinguish between these alternative models. In both experiments, participants began from baseline, within-modal, view-dependence for object recognition in both vision and haptics. The first experiment induced within-modal view-independence by perceptual learning, which was completely and symmetrically transferred cross-modally: visual view-independence acquired through visual learning also resulted in haptic view-independence and vice versa. In the second experiment, both visual and haptic view-dependence were transformed to view-independence by either haptic-visual or visual-haptic cross-modal learning. We conclude that cross-modal view-independence fits with a model in which unisensory view-dependent representations are directly integrated into a bisensory, view-independent representation, rather than via intermediate, unisensory, view-independent representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19484467      PMCID: PMC2987670          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1856-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; William G Hayward; Michael J Tarr; Adam W Anderson; Pawel Skudlarski; John C Gore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  S Edelman; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago?

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture.

Authors:  Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Human information processing and sensory modality: cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit.

Authors:  D Freides
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Three-month-old infants' object recognition across changes in viewpoint using an operant learning procedure.

Authors:  Kimberly S Kraebel; Peter C Gerhardstein
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2005-11-07

9.  Learning sequence of views of three-dimensional objects: the effect of temporal coherence on object memory.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Women's deficiency in water-level representation: present in visual conditions yet absent in haptic contexts.

Authors:  M Robert; J Pelletier; R St-Onge; F Berthiaume
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1994-10
View more
  14 in total

1.  Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities.

Authors:  Nina Gaissert; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Are surface properties integrated into visuohaptic object representations?

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jenelle Hall; K Sathian
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jonathan B Lin; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multisensory convergence of visual and haptic object preference across development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Cross-modal visuo-haptic mental rotation: comparing objects between senses.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Maarten W A Wijntjes; Erik C Kool; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  CROSSMODAL AND MULTISENSORY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN VISION AND TOUCH.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; K Sathian
Journal:  Scholarpedia J       Date:  2015

Review 8.  Cross-modal plasticity of tactile perception in blindness.

Authors:  K Sathian; Randall Stilla
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; K Sathian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.