Literature DB >> 22048319

Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities.

Nina Gaissert1, Christian Wallraven.   

Abstract

Although the hands are the most important tool for humans to manipulate objects, only little is known about haptic processing of natural objects. Here, we selected a unique set of natural objects, namely seashells, which vary along a variety of object features, while others are shared across all stimuli. To correctly interact with objects, they have to be identified or categorized. For both processes, measuring similarities between objects is crucial. Our goal is to better understand the haptic similarity percept by comparing it to the visual similarity percept. First, direct similarity measures were analyzed using multidimensional scaling techniques to visualize the perceptual spaces of both modalities. We find that the visual and the haptic modality form almost identical perceptual spaces. Next, we performed three different categorization tasks. All tasks exhibit a highly accurate processing of complex shapes of the haptic modality. Moreover, we find that objects grouped into the same category form regions within the perceptual space. Hence, in both modalities, perceived similarity constitutes the basis for categorizing objects. Moreover, both modalities focus on shape to form categories. Taken together, our results lead to the assumption that the same cognitive processes link haptic and visual similarity perception and the resulting categorization behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22048319     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2916-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

Review 1.  Visual object understanding.

Authors:  Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects.

Authors:  Susan Haag
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-19

3.  Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  Theresa Cooke; Frank Jäkel; Christian Wallraven; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.

Authors:  J M Loomis; R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky; C Chataway; C D Summers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

6.  Representation of object similarity in human vision: psychophysics and a computational model.

Authors:  F Cutzu; S Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects.

Authors:  E W Bushnell; C Baxt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Katrien Torfs; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Marisa Pappas; Alexandra Kreps; Kevin Lee; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  11 in total

1.  Multisensory Part-based Representations of Objects in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Flip Phillips; Jessica S Holmin; Hideko F Norman; Amanda M Beers; Alexandria M Boswell; Jacob R Cheeseman; Angela G Stethen; Cecilia Ronning
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  "Can touch this": Cross-modal shape categorization performance is associated with microstructural characteristics of white matter association pathways.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Christian Wallraven; Laurent Petit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Exploring Tactile Perceptual Dimensions Using Materials Associated with Sensory Vocabulary.

Authors:  Maki Sakamoto; Junji Watanabe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-13

5.  Haptic categorical perception of shape.

Authors:  Nina Gaißert; Steffen Waterkamp; Roland W Fleming; Isabelle Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The eyes grasp, the hands see: metric category knowledge transfers between vision and touch.

Authors:  Christian Wallraven; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Steffen Waterkamp; Loes van Dam; Nina Gaissert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

Review 7.  Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; K Sathian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17

8.  From Sensory Signals to Modality-Independent Conceptual Representations: A Probabilistic Language of Thought Approach.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Ilker Yildirim; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Haptic adaptation to slant: No transfer between exploration modes.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Myrthe A Plaisier; Catharina Glowania; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Haptic object recognition based on shape relates to visual object recognition ability.

Authors:  Jason K Chow; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.