Literature DB >> 16903801

Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago?

Jessie J Peissig1, Michael J Tarr.   

Abstract

We review the progress made in the field of object recognition over the past two decades. Structural-description models, making their appearance in the early 1980s, inspired a wealth of empirical research. Moving to the 1990s, psychophysical evidence for view-based accounts of recognition challenged some of the fundamental assumptions of structural-description theories. The 1990s also saw increased interest in the neurophysiological study of high-level visual cortex, the results of which provide some constraints on how objects may be represented. By 2000, neuroimaging arose as a viable means for connecting neurons to behavior. One of the most striking fMRI results has been category selectivity, which provided further constraints for models of object recognition. Despite this progress, the field is still faced with the challenge of developing a comprehensive theory that integrates this ever-increasing body of results and explains how we perceive and recognize objects.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16903801     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.102904.190114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  33 in total

1.  On the three-quarter view advantage of familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Kohei Nonose; Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-21

2.  Representing part-whole relations in conceptual spaces.

Authors:  Sandro Rama Fiorini; Peter Gärdenfors; Mara Abel
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-22

3.  Multisensory Part-based Representations of Objects in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Conjunctive Coding of Complex Object Features.

Authors:  Jonathan Erez; Rhodri Cusack; William Kendall; Morgan D Barense
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Some views are better than others: evidence for a visual bias in object views self-generated by toddlers.

Authors:  Karin H James; Susan S Jones; Shelley Swain; Alfredo Pereira; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-01-11

6.  Cultural differences in visual object recognition in 3-year-old children.

Authors:  Megumi Kuwabara; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-03-14

7.  Parts and Relations in Young Children's Shape-Based Object Recognition.

Authors:  Elaine Augustine; Linda B Smith; Susan S Jones
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2011-10

8.  Invariance in visual object recognition requires training: a computational argument.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.