Literature DB >> 19482097

Voxel size and measures of individual resorption cavities in three-dimensional images of cancellous bone.

Evgeniy V Tkachenko1, Craig R Slyfield, Ryan E Tomlinson, Justin R Daggett, David L Wilson, Christopher John Hernandez.   

Abstract

Cavities formed by osteoclasts on the surface of cancellous bone during bone remodeling (resorption cavities) are believed to act as stress risers and impair cancellous bone strength and stiffness. Although resorption cavities are readily detected as eroded surfaces in histology sections, identification of resorption cavities in three-dimensional images of cancellous bone has been rare. Here we use sub-micrometer resolution images of rat lumbar vertebral cancellous bone obtained through serial milling (n=5) to determine how measures of the number and surface area of resorption cavities are influenced by image resolution. Three-dimensional images of a 1 mm cube of cancellous bone were collected at 0.7x0.7x5.0 microm/voxel using fluorescence based serial milling and uniformly coarsened to four other resolutions ranging from 1.4x1.4x5.0 to 11.2x11.2x10 microm/voxel. Cavities were identified in the three-dimensional image as an indentation on the cancellous bone surface and were confirmed as eroded surfaces by viewing two-dimensional cross-sections (mimicking histology techniques). The number of cavities observed in the 0.7x0.7x5.0 microm/voxel images (22.0+/-1.43, mean+/-SD) was not significantly different from that in the 1.4x1.4x5.0 microm/voxel images (19.2+/-2.59) and an average of 79% of the cavities observed at both of these resolutions were coincident. However, at lower resolutions, cavity detection was confounded by low sensitivity (<20%) and high false positive rates (>40%). Our results demonstrate that when image voxel size exceeds 1.4x1.4x5.0 microm/voxel identification of resorption cavities by bone surface morphology is highly inaccurate. Experimental and computational studies of resorption cavities in three-dimensional images of cancellous bone may therefore require images to be collected at resolutions of 1.4 microm/pixel in-plane or better to ensure consistent identification of resorption cavities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19482097      PMCID: PMC2728288          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  22 in total

1.  Mechanical consequences of bone loss in cancellous bone.

Authors:  J C van der Linden; J Homminga; J A Verhaar; H Weinans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Is BMU-coupling a strain-regulated phenomenon? A finite element analysis.

Authors:  T H Smit; E H Burger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk.

Authors:  P Garnero
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  High bone turnover is intrinsically harmful: two paths to a similar conclusion. The Parfitt view.

Authors:  A Michael Parfitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Bone structure and mineralization demonstrated using synchrotron radiation computed tomography (SR-CT) in animal models: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Masako Ito; Sadakazu Ejiri; Hiroshi Jinnai; Jun Kono; Satoshi Ikeda; Akifumi Nishida; Kentaro Uesugi; Naoto Yagi; Mikako Tanaka; Kuniaki Hayashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Is the paradigm shifting?

Authors:  Robert P Heaney
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  A computerised technique for the quantitative assessment of resorption cavities in trabecular bone.

Authors:  N J Garrahan; P I Croucher; J E Compston
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; M K Drezner; F H Glorieux; J A Kanis; H Malluche; P J Meunier; S M Ott; R R Recker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Scanning electron microscopy of bone.

Authors:  A Boyde; M Hobdell
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1968

10.  Consequences of the remodelling process for vertebral trabecular bone structure: a scanning electron microscopy study (uncoupling of unloaded structures).

Authors:  L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-07
View more
  15 in total

1.  Fatigue-induced microdamage in cancellous bone occurs distant from resorption cavities and trabecular surfaces.

Authors:  M G Goff; F M Lambers; T M Nguyen; J Sung; C M Rimnac; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Mechanical failure begins preferentially near resorption cavities in human vertebral cancellous bone under compression.

Authors:  C R Slyfield; E V Tkachenko; S E Fischer; K M Ehlert; I H Yi; M G Jekir; R G O'Brien; T M Keaveny; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Minimizing Interpolation Bias and Precision Error in In Vivo µCT-Based Measurements of Bone Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Allison R Altman; Connie Li; Mary Beth Tribble; Carina Lott; Wei-Ju Tseng; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Three-dimensional characterization of resorption cavity size and location in human vertebral trabecular bone.

Authors:  M G Goff; C R Slyfield; S R Kummari; E V Tkachenko; S E Fischer; Y H Yi; M G Jekir; T M Keaveny; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  From histology to micro-CT: Measuring and modeling resorption cavities and their relation to bone competence.

Authors:  Jef Vanderoost; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-28

6.  The effects of tensile-compressive loading mode and microarchitecture on microdamage in human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Floor M Lambers; Amanda R Bouman; Evgeniy V Tkachenko; Tony M Keaveny; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Prediction of new clinical vertebral fractures in elderly men using finite element analysis of CT scans.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Arnav Sanyal; Peggy M Cawthon; Lisa Palermo; Michael Jekir; John Christensen; Kristine E Ensrud; Steven R Cummings; Eric Orwoll; Dennis M Black; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  μCT-based, in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry allows 3D evaluation of the early responses of bone resorption and formation to PTH and alendronate combination therapy.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Allison R Altman; Wei-Ju Tseng; Mary Beth Tribble; Connie Li; Abhishek Chandra; Ling Qin; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Morphological assessment of basic multicellular unit resorption parameters in dogs shows additional mechanisms of bisphosphonate effects on bone.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; Antonia M Erickson; Xiang Wang; David B Burr; R Bruce Martin; Scott J Hazelwood
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Anti-resorptive agents reduce the size of resorption cavities: a three-dimensional dynamic bone histomorphometry study.

Authors:  J B Matheny; C R Slyfield; E V Tkachenko; I Lin; K M Ehlert; R E Tomlinson; D L Wilson; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.