Literature DB >> 17980331

Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients.

Cécile Rivoire1, Revaz Botchorishvili, Michel Canis, Kris Jardon, Benoit Rabischong, Arnaud Wattiez, Gérard Mage.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility and anatomic and functional results of complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes.
DESIGN: Retrospective monocentric study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Polyclinique Hôtel Dieu, France. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight consecutive patients operated from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2003.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic promontofixation using meshes placed anteriorly in the vesicovaginal space and posteriorly to the levator ani muscles and in the prerectal space. In the space of Retzius, the anterior compartment was treated with paravaginal repair, Burch colposuspension, or both.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 33.7 months, with 7 patients lost to follow-up. Mean operating time was 190 minutes without any conversion to laparotomy or major perioperative complications. In all, 98% of patients were satisfied with the operation. Anatomic recurrence rate was 11%, and functional recurrence rate was 12%, with maximum delay of 40 months. A total of 57 patients (46%) had postoperative stress urinary incontinence (grade 1 or 2 in most cases), including 9 who did not receive any perioperative treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Seven patients (5%) had vaginal erosion, and for 2 of them (1%), meshes had to be removed because of infectious complications.
CONCLUSION: Complete laparoscopic treatment of prolapse including promontofixation appears to be an efficient and viable technique. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence as a consequence of surgery should be improved. Laparoscopic placement of meshes induced few complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980331     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  18 in total

1.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy--a single centre's experience.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jan Paul Roovers; Paul Lewi; Jasper Verguts; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-29

Review 3.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

5.  Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  A Germain; F Thibault; M Galifet; M-L Scherrer; A Ayav; J Hubert; L Brunaud; L Bresler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients.

Authors:  Nikolaus Veit-Rubin; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Sören Lange; Isabelle Eperon; Jean Dubuisson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Alessandro Zucchi; Massimo Lazzeri; Massimo Porena; Luigi Mearini; Elisabetta Costantini
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  [Reconstructive pelvic surgery. Current status and future perspectives].

Authors:  J N Nyarangi-Dix; N Djakovic; M Kurosch; A Haferkamp; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.

Authors:  David Vandendriessche; Julie Sussfeld; Géraldine Giraudet; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Hélène Behal; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.