Literature DB >> 19477296

Statistical model to estimate a threshold dose and its confidence limits for the analysis of sublinear dose-response relationships, exemplified for mutagenicity data.

Werner K Lutz1, Roman W Lutz.   

Abstract

Strongly sublinear dose-response relationships (slope increasing with dose) raise the question about a putative threshold dose below which no biologically relevant effect would be expected. A mathematical threshold with a break in the curve at the threshold dose is generally rejected for consequences of genotoxicity such as mutation, because proportionality between low dose and the rate of DNA-adduct formation is a reasonable hypothesis. In view of an increasing database for distinct deviation from linearity for mutagenicity, we offer a statistical model to analyze continuous response data and estimate a threshold dose together with its confidence limits, thereby taking data quality and degree of sublinearity into account. The simplest mathematical threshold model is a hockey stick defined by a low-dose part with slope zero at background level a to a theoretical break point at threshold dose td, followed by a linear increase above td with slope b. The function is y (dose d)=a+bx(d-td)x1([d>td]). Using the free statistics software package "R", we make a procedure available to estimate the parameters a, b, and td. Confidence intervals are calculated for all parameters at a significance level that can be defined by the user. If the lower limit of the confidence interval for td is >0, linearity is rejected. The procedure is illustrated by two examples. A small data set with three replicates per dose group, indicating a threshold for the induction of thymidine kinase mutants in L5178Y tk(+/-) mouse lymphoma cells treated with methyl methanesulfonate, did not achieve significance. On the other hand, the large data set reported in this issue (Gocke et al.) on lacZ mutants in bone marrow cells of transgenic mice treated with ethyl methanesulfonate strongly favoured the hockey stick model. The question of a theoretically expected linear dose-related increase below the threshold dose is addressed by linear regression of the data below the break point and estimation of an upper limit of the slope. The question of biological relevance of the resulting slope is discussed against the normal variation of background measures in the control group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477296     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  14 in total

1.  Pro-oxidant induced DNA damage in human lymphoblastoid cells: homeostatic mechanisms of genotoxic tolerance.

Authors:  Anna L Seager; Ume-Kulsoom Shah; Jane M Mikhail; Bryant C Nelson; Bryce J Marquis; Shareen H Doak; George E Johnson; Sioned M Griffiths; Paul L Carmichael; Sharon J Scott; Andrew D Scott; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Defining EMS and ENU dose-response relationships using the Pig-a mutation assay in rats.

Authors:  Krista L Dobo; Ronald D Fiedler; William C Gunther; Catherine J Thiffeault; Zoryana Cammerer; Stephanie L Coffing; Thomas Shutsky; Maik Schuler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Miniaturized flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay represents an efficient tool for comprehensively characterizing genotoxicity dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Souk Phonethepswath; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Can case study approaches speed implementation of the NRC report: "toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy?".

Authors:  Melvin E Andersen; Harvey J Clewell; Paul L Carmichael; Kim Boekelheide
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  Genotoxic mixtures and dissimilar action: concepts for prediction and assessment.

Authors:  Sibylle Ermler; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Contributions of DNA repair and damage response pathways to the non-linear genotoxic responses of alkylating agents.

Authors:  Joanna Klapacz; Lynn H Pottenger; Bevin P Engelward; Christopher D Heinen; George E Johnson; Rebecca A Clewell; Paul L Carmichael; Yeyejide Adeleye; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.657

7.  REPARATION: ribosome profiling assisted (re-)annotation of bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Elvis Ndah; Veronique Jonckheere; Adam Giess; Eivind Valen; Gerben Menschaert; Petra Van Damme
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Seven benzimidazole pesticides combined at sub-threshold levels induce micronuclei in vitro.

Authors:  Sibylle Ermler; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  A mode-of-action approach for the identification of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Lya G Hernández; Jan van Benthem; George E Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Kinetic Modeling Reveals the Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging and DNA Repair Processes in Shaping the Dose-Response Curve of KBrO₃-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Maria A Spassova; David J Miller; Alexander S Nikolov
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.