Literature DB >> 21729764

Defining EMS and ENU dose-response relationships using the Pig-a mutation assay in rats.

Krista L Dobo1, Ronald D Fiedler, William C Gunther, Catherine J Thiffeault, Zoryana Cammerer, Stephanie L Coffing, Thomas Shutsky, Maik Schuler.   

Abstract

In recent years, experimental evidence has accumulated that supports the existence of sublinear dose-response relationships at low doses of DNA reactive mutagens. However, creating the in vivo data necessary to allow for a more detailed dose-response modeling with the currently available tools might not always be practical. The purpose of the current work was to evaluate the utility of the Pig-a gene mutation assay to rapidly identify dose-response relationships for direct acting genotoxicants. The induction of mutations in the peripheral blood of rats was evaluated following 28 days of exposure down to low doses of the direct acting alkylating agents ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) and ethylnitrosourea (ENU). Using statistical modeling based on the 28-day studies, a threshold for mutation induction for EMS was estimated to be 21.9mg/kg, whereas for the more potent ENU, the threshold was estimated to be 0.88mg/kg. Comparing mutation frequencies from acute and sub-chronic dosing indicated less than additive dose-response relationships, further confirming the possibility of a threshold dose-response relationship for both compounds. In conclusion, the work presented provides evidence that the Pig-a assay might be a practical alternative to other in vivo mutation assays when assessing dose-response relationships for direct acting mutagens and that an experimental approach using fractionated dosing could be used to substantiate a biological mechanism responsible for the observation of a sublinear dose-response relationship. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729764      PMCID: PMC3167948          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  29 in total

1.  Effects of extended chronic exposures on endogenous and transgenic loci: implications for low-dose extrapolations.

Authors:  L Cosentino; J A Heddle
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  A comparison of the effects of diverse mutagens at the lacZ transgene and Dlb-1 locus in vivo.

Authors:  L Cosentino; J A Heddle
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Site-specific mutagenesis by O6-alkylguanines located in the chromosomes of mammalian cells: influence of the mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase.

Authors:  K S Ellison; E Dogliotti; T D Connors; A K Basu; J M Essigmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  In vivo genotoxicity of EMS: statistical assessment of the dose response curves.

Authors:  Elmar Gocke; Michael Wall
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 5.  Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents.

Authors:  D T Beranek
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  A comparison of the genotoxicity of ethylnitrosourea and ethyl methanesulfonate in lacZ transgenic mice (Muta Mouse).

Authors:  T Suzuki; M Hayashi; X Wang; K Yamamoto; T Ono; B C Myhr; T Sofuni
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1997-12-05       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Toxicity, mutagenicity, and mutational spectra of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in human cell lines with different DNA repair phenotypes.

Authors:  S M Bronstein; J E Cochrane; T R Craft; J A Swenberg; T R Skopek
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Formation and stability of alkylated pyrimidines and purines (including imidazole ring-opened 7-alkylguanine) and alkylphosphotriesters in liver DNA of adult rats treated with ethylnitrosourea or dimethylnitrosamine.

Authors:  L Den Engelse; G J Menkveld; R J De Brij; A D Tates
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Marked differences in the role of O6-alkylguanine in hprt mutagenesis in T-lymphocytes of rats exposed in vivo to ethylmethanesulfonate, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-N-nitrosourea, or N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea.

Authors:  J G Jansen; H Vrieling; C M van Teijlingen; G R Mohn; A D Tates; A A van Zeeland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  O2- and O4-ethylthymine and the ethylphosphotriester dTp(Et)dT are highly persistent DNA modifications in slowly dividing tissues of the ethylnitrosourea-treated rat.

Authors:  L Den Engelse; A De Graaf; R J De Brij; G J Menkveld
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.944

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Genotoxic Substances in the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Authors:  Ester Lovsin Barle; Gian Christian Winkler; Susanne Glowienke; Azeddine Elhajouji; Jana Nunic; Hans-Joerg Martus
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Complete protection against aflatoxin B(1)-induced liver cancer with a triterpenoid: DNA adduct dosimetry, molecular signature, and genotoxicity threshold.

Authors:  Natalie M Johnson; Patricia A Egner; Victoria K Baxter; Michael B Sporn; Ryan S Wible; Thomas R Sutter; John D Groopman; Thomas W Kensler; Bill D Roebuck
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-03-24

4.  Simple monitoring of gene targeting efficiency in human somatic cell lines using the PIGA gene.

Authors:  Sivasundaram Karnan; Yuko Konishi; Akinobu Ota; Miyuki Takahashi; Lkhagvasuren Damdindorj; Yoshitaka Hosokawa; Hiroyuki Konishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of DNA repair on nonlinear dose-responses for mutation.

Authors:  Adam D Thomas; Gareth J S Jenkins; Bernd Kaina; Owen G Bodger; Karl-Heinz Tomaszowski; Paul D Lewis; Shareen H Doak; George E Johnson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.849

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.