Literature DB >> 22539617

Pro-oxidant induced DNA damage in human lymphoblastoid cells: homeostatic mechanisms of genotoxic tolerance.

Anna L Seager1, Ume-Kulsoom Shah, Jane M Mikhail, Bryant C Nelson, Bryce J Marquis, Shareen H Doak, George E Johnson, Sioned M Griffiths, Paul L Carmichael, Sharon J Scott, Andrew D Scott, Gareth J S Jenkins.   

Abstract

Oxidative stress contributes to many disease etiologies including ageing, neurodegeneration, and cancer, partly through DNA damage induction (genotoxicity). Understanding the i nteractions of free radicals with DNA is fundamental to discern mutation risks. In genetic toxicology, regulatory authorities consider that most genotoxins exhibit a linear relationship between dose and mutagenic response. Yet, homeostatic mechanisms, including DNA repair, that allow cells to tolerate low levels of genotoxic exposure exist. Acceptance of thresholds for genotoxicity has widespread consequences in terms of understanding cancer risk and regulating human exposure to chemicals/drugs. Three pro-oxidant chemicals, hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), potassium bromate (KBrO(3)), and menadione, were examined for low dose-response curves in human lymphoblastoid cells. DNA repair and antioxidant capacity were assessed as possible threshold mechanisms. H(2)O(2) and KBrO(3), but not menadione, exhibited thresholded responses, containing a range of nongenotoxic low doses. Levels of the DNA glycosylase 8-oxoguanine glycosylase were unchanged in response to pro- oxidant stress. DNA repair-focused gene expression arrays reported changes in ATM and BRCA1, involved in double-strand break repair, in response to low-dose pro-oxidant exposure; however, these alterations were not substantiated at the protein level. Determination of oxidatively induced DNA damage in H(2)O(2)-treated AHH-1 cells reported accumulation of thymine glycol above the genotoxic threshold. Further, the H(2)O(2) dose-response curve was shifted by modulating the antioxidant glutathione. Hence, observed pro- oxidant thresholds were due to protective capacities of base excision repair enzymes and antioxidants against DNA damage, highlighting the importance of homeostatic mechanisms in "genotoxic tolerance."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22539617      PMCID: PMC3493188          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  36 in total

1.  Thresholds in genotoxicity responses.

Authors:  L Henderson; S Albertini; M Aardema
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-01-03       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Enhancement of OGG1 protein AP lyase activity by increase of APEX protein.

Authors:  T Saitoh; K Shinmura; S Yamaguchi; M Tani; S Seki; H Murakami; Y Nojima; J Yokota
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Biological consequences of free radical-damaged DNA bases.

Authors:  Susan S Wallace
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 4.  Oxidatively generated base damage to cellular DNA.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; Thierry Douki; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase plays a pivotal role in the threshold response of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced chromosome damage.

Authors:  Zoulikha M Zaïr; Gareth J Jenkins; Shareen H Doak; Raj Singh; Karen Brown; George E Johnson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  The human OGG1 gene: structure, functions, and its implication in the process of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S Boiteux; J P Radicella
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Significant damage of the skin and hair following hair bleaching.

Authors:  Mi-Sook Jeong; Chang-Moon Lee; Won-Ji Jeong; Seong-Jin Kim; Ki-Young Lee
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.005

8.  Characterization of the hOGG1 promoter and its expression during the cell cycle.

Authors:  A Dhénaut; S Boiteux; J P Radicella
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Involvement of mammalian OGG1(MMH) in excision of the 8-hydroxyguanine residue in DNA.

Authors:  Susumu Nishimura
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 7.376

10.  Modulation of hOGG1 DNA repair enzyme in human cultured cells in response to pro-oxidant and antioxidant challenge.

Authors:  Pratibha Mistry; Karl E Herbert
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 7.376

View more
  6 in total

1.  Detection of DNA damage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Rick J Jansen; Sharon Fonseca-Williams; William R Bamlet; Sylvette Ayala-Peña; Ann L Oberg; Gloria M Petersen; Carlos A Torres-Ramos
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  New aspects in deriving health-based guidance values for bromate in swimming pool water.

Authors:  C Röhl; M Batke; G Damm; A Freyberger; T Gebel; U Gundert-Remy; J G Hengstler; A Mangerich; A Matthiessen; F Partosch; T Schupp; K M Wollin; H Foth
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.168

3.  Automation and validation of micronucleus detection in the 3D EpiDerm™ human reconstructed skin assay and correlation with 2D dose responses.

Authors:  K E Chapman; A D Thomas; J W Wills; S Pfuhler; S H Doak; G J S Jenkins
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Kinetic Modeling Reveals the Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging and DNA Repair Processes in Shaping the Dose-Response Curve of KBrO₃-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Maria A Spassova; David J Miller; Alexander S Nikolov
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 5.  Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast.

Authors:  Jessica S Helm; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  The clastogenicity of 4NQO is cell-type dependent and linked to cytotoxicity, length of exposure and p53 proficiency.

Authors:  Katja Brüsehafer; Bella B Manshian; Ann T Doherty; Zoulikha M Zaïr; George E Johnson; Shareen H Doak; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.954

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.