Literature DB >> 19474047

Mobbing calls signal predator category in a kin group-living bird species.

Michael Griesser1.   

Abstract

Many prey species gather together to approach and harass their predators despite the associated risks. While mobbing, prey usually utter calls and previous experiments have demonstrated that mobbing calls can convey information about risk to conspecifics. However, the risk posed by predators also differs between predator categories. The ability to communicate predator category would be adaptive because it would allow other mobbers to adjust their risk taking. I tested this idea in Siberian jays Perisoreus infaustus, a group-living bird species, by exposing jay groups to mounts of three hawk and three owl species of varying risks. Groups immediately approached to mob the mount and uttered up to 14 different call types. Jays gave more calls when mobbing a more dangerous predator and when in the presence of kin. Five call types were predator-category-specific and jays uttered two hawk-specific and three owl-specific call types. Thus, this is one of the first studies to demonstrate that mobbing calls can simultaneously encode information about both predator category and the risk posed by a predator. Since antipredator calls of Siberian jays are known to specifically aim at reducing the risk to relatives, kin-based sociality could be an important factor in facilitating the evolution of predator-category-specific mobbing calls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19474047      PMCID: PMC2817204          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  Reduced mortality selects for family cohesion in a social species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Magdalena Nystrand; Jan Ekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Impact of forestry practices on fitness correlates and population productivity in an open-nesting bird species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Magdalena Nystrand; Sönke Eggers; Jan Ekman
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Referential calls signal predator behavior in a group-living bird species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  A DNA test to sex most birds.

Authors:  R Griffiths; M C Double; K Orr; R J Dawson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of powerful owls, Ninox strenua

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  The information that receivers extract from alarm calls in suricates.

Authors:  M B Manser; M B Bell; L B Fletcher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication.

Authors:  R M Seyfarth; D L Cheney; P Marler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton; Erick Greene; Kate Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Referential labelling in Diana monkeys.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  The acoustic structure of suricates' alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency.

Authors:  M B Manser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  The risk of predation favors cooperation among breeding prey.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Tatjana Krama; Arnis Berzins; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-05

2.  The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Hanna Kokko; Jolanta Vrublevska; Mikus Abolins-Abols; Tatjana Krama; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Influence of gaze and directness of approach on the escape responses of the Indian rock lizard, Psammophilus dorsalis (Gray, 1831).

Authors:  Rachakonda Sreekar; Suhel Quader
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  The increased risk of predation enhances cooperation.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Arnis Bērziņs; Tatjana Krama; David Wheatcroft; Kristīne Igaune; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Stability of referential signalling across time and locations: testing alarm calls of Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) in urban and rural Australia and in Fiji.

Authors:  Gisela Kaplan; Lesley J Rogers
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Distress Calls of a Fast-Flying Bat (Molossus molossus) Provoke Inspection Flights but Not Cooperative Mobbing.

Authors:  Gerald Carter; Diana Schoeppler; Marie Manthey; Mirjam Knörnschild; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Do warning calls boost survival of signal recipients? Evidence from a field experiment in a group-living bird species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Mirror-mark tests performed on jackdaws reveal potential methodological problems in the use of stickers in avian mark-test studies.

Authors:  Manuel Soler; Tomás Pérez-Contreras; Juan Manuel Peralta-Sánchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird calls.

Authors:  Toshitaka N Suzuki; David Wheatcroft; Michael Griesser
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Who do you trust? Wild birds use social knowledge to avoid being deceived.

Authors:  Filipe C R Cunha; Michael Griesser
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.