| Literature DB >> 23864603 |
Indrikis Krams1, Hanna Kokko, Jolanta Vrublevska, Mikus Abolins-Abols, Tatjana Krama, Markus J Rantala.
Abstract
Reciprocal altruism describes a situation in which an organism acts in a manner that temporarily reduces its fitness while increasing another organism's fitness, but there is an ultimate fitness benefit based on an expectation that the other organism will act in a similar manner at a later time. It creates the obvious dilemma in which there is always a short-term benefit to cheating, therefore cooperating individuals must avoid being exploited by non-cooperating cheaters. This is achieved by following various decision rules, usually variants of the tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy. The strength of TFT, however, is also its weakness-mistakes in implementation or interpretation of moves, or the inability to cooperate, lead to a permanent breakdown in cooperation. We show that pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) use a TFT with an embedded 'excuse principle' to forgive the neighbours that were perceived as unable to cooperate during mobbing of predators. The excuse principle dramatically increases the stability of TFT-like behavioural strategies within the Prisoner's Dilemma game.Entities:
Keywords: Prisoner's Dilemma; birds; cooperation; reciprocal altruism; tit-for-tat
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23864603 PMCID: PMC3730606 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349