Literature DB >> 24296885

Influence of gaze and directness of approach on the escape responses of the Indian rock lizard, Psammophilus dorsalis (Gray, 1831).

Rachakonda Sreekar1, Suhel Quader.   

Abstract

Animals often evaluate the degree of risk posed by a predator and respond accordingly. Since many predators orient their eyes towards prey while attacking, predator gaze and directness of approach could serve as conspicuous indicators of risk to prey. The ability to perceive these cues and discriminate between high and low predation risk should benefit prey species through both higher survival and decreased energy expenditure. We experimentally examined whether Indian rock lizards (Psammophilus dorsalis) can perceive these two indicators of predation risk by measuring the variation in their fleeing behaviour in response to type of gaze and approach by a human predator. Overall, we found that the gaze and approach of the predator influenced flight initiation distance, which also varied with attributes of the prey (i.e. size/sex and tail-raise behaviour). Flight initiation distance (FID) was 43 percent longer during direct approaches with direct gaze compared with tangential approaches with averted gaze. In further, exploratory, analyses, we found that FID was 23 percent shorter for adult male lizards than for female or young male (FYM) lizards. In addition, FYM lizards that showed a tail-raise display during approach had a 71 percent longer FID than those that did not. Our results suggest that multiple factors influence the decision to flee in animals. Further studies are needed to test the generality of these factors and to investigate the proximate mechanisms underlying flight decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24296885     DOI: 10.1007/s12038-013-9378-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  9 in total

1.  Bee-eaters ( Merops orientalis) respond to what a predator can see.

Authors:  Milind Watve; Juilee Thakar; Abhijit Kale; Shweta Puntambekar; Imran Shaikh; Kaustubh Vaze; Maithili Jog; Sharayu Paranjape
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-11-16       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment.

Authors:  Theodore Stankowich; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Optimal flight initiation distance.

Authors:  William E Cooper; William G Frederick
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Mobbing calls signal predator category in a kin group-living bird species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predator.

Authors:  O Hasson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton; Erick Greene; Kate Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Honest signalling during prey-predator interactions in the lizard Anolis cristatellus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Direction of predator approach and the decision to flee to a refuge

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator's direction of eye-gaze.

Authors:  Julia Carter; Nicholas J Lyons; Hannah L Cole; Arthur R Goldsmith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) gaze is conspicuous at ecologically-relevant distances.

Authors:  Will Whitham; Steven J Schapiro; Jolyon Troscianko; Jessica L Yorzinski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  The gaze of a social monkey is perceptible to conspecifics and predators but not prey.

Authors:  Will Whitham; Steven J Schapiro; Jolyon Troscianko; Jessica L Yorzinski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.