Literature DB >> 9480699

Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of powerful owls, Ninox strenua

.   

Abstract

We observed the species and numbers of mobbing birds and their effects on a large, nocturnal, bird-eating predator, the powerful owl, together with the pattern of owl predation on mobbing and non-mobbing species. Owls were mobbed on 35 occasions by seven of 44 species of forest birds at a site composed of open forest (88% by area) and rainforest (12%). The majority of bouts involved individuals of a single species, although mixed groups were observed on nine occasions. Regular mobbers were between 4 and 26% of the owls' body weight. Owls abandoned their daytime roosts during 20% of bouts and responded by calling or actively monitoring mobbers during 54% of bouts. Mobbing appeared to explain why owls roosted in rainforest significantly more often than expected by its availability, mobbing being significantly less frequent in rainforest than in open forest. Only one mobbing species regularly occupied rainforest and the canopy of roosts in rainforest was denser than that in open forest, thus reducing the chances of an owl being detected by potential mobbers. Twelve species of forest birds were within the range of prey size of the powerful owl (75-800 g): six were mobbers and six non-mobbers. The frequency of owl predation on non-mobbers was 8.75 times that on mobbers. The species in this study took a high risk by mobbing a very large predator, but benefited by greatly reducing their chances of predation.Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9480699     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  7 in total

1.  Mobbing calls signal predator category in a kin group-living bird species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social learning spreads knowledge about dangerous humans among American crows.

Authors:  Heather N Cornell; John M Marzluff; Shannon Pecoraro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Distinct neural circuits underlie assessment of a diversity of natural dangers by American crows.

Authors:  Donna J Cross; John M Marzluff; Ila Palmquist; Satoshi Minoshima; Toru Shimizu; Robert Miyaoka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Dark or short nights: differential latitudinal constraints in nestling provisioning patterns of a nocturnally hunting bird species.

Authors:  Markéta Zárybnická; Erkki Korpimäki; Michael Griesser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Seasonal changes in mixed-species bird flocks and antipredator information.

Authors:  Demeng Jiang; Kathryn E Sieving; Estelle Meaux; Eben Goodale
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Nadine Kalb; Fabian Anger; Christoph Randler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  You mob my owl, I'll mob yours: birds play tit-for-tat game.

Authors:  Tatjana Krama; Jolanta Vrublevska; Todd M Freeberg; Cecilia Kullberg; Markus J Rantala; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.