Johannes Siebermair1,2,3,4, Eugene G Kholmovski2,5, Douglas Sheffer2, Joyce Schroeder5, Leif Jensen5, Mobin Kheirkhahan2,6, Alex A Baher2, Majd M Ibrahim7, Theresa Reiter8, Tienush Rassaf1, Reza Wakili1,3,4, Nassir F Marrouche2,9, Christopher J McGann2,10, Brent D Wilson2,7. 1. Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Essen Medical School, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 2. Comprehensive Arrhythmia Research & Management Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 3. Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. 4. German Cardiovascular Research Center (DZHK), partner site: Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany. 5. UCAIR, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA. 7. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 9. Section of Cardiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. 10. Swedish Heart and Vascular Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been established as an important imaging method in cardiac ablation procedures. In pulmonary vein (PV) isolation procedures, MRA has the potential to minimize the risk of severe complications, such as atrio-esophageal fistula, by providing detailed information on esophageal position relatively to cardiac structures. However, traditional non-gated, first-pass (FP) MRA approaches have several limitations, such as long breath-holds, non-uniform signal intensity throughout the left atrium (LA), and poor esophageal visualization. The aim of this observational study was to validate a respiratory-navigated, ECG-gated (EC), saturation recovery-prepared MRA technique for simultaneous imaging of LA, LA appendage, PVs, esophagus, and adjacent anatomical structures. METHODS: Before PVI, 106 consecutive patients with a history of AF underwent either conventional FP-MRA (n = 53 patients) or our new EC-MRA (n = 53 patients). Five quality scores (QS) of LA and esophagus visibility were assessed by two experienced readers. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare QS between FP-MRA and EC-MRA groups, and linear regression was applied to assess clinical contributors to image quality. RESULTS: EC-MRA demonstrated significantly better image quality than FP-MRA in every quality category. Esophageal visibility using the new MRA technique was markedly better than with the conventional FP-MRA technique (median 3.5 [IQR 1] vs median 1.0, p < 0.001). In contrast to FP-MRA, overall image quality of EC-MRA was not influenced by heart rate. CONCLUSION: Our ECG-gated, respiratory-navigated, saturation recovery-prepared MRA technique provides significantly better image quality and esophageal visibility than the established non-gated, breath-holding FP-MRA. Image quality of EC-MRA technique has the additional advantage of being unaffected by heart rate. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Detailed information of cardiac anatomy has the potential to minimize the risk of severe complications and improve success rates in invasive electrophysiological studies. Our novel ECG-gated, respiratory-navigated, saturation recovery-prepared MRA technique provides significantly better image quality of LA and esophageal structures than the traditional first-pass algorithm. This new MRA technique is robust to arrhythmia (tachycardic, irregular heart rates) frequently observed in AF patients.
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been established as an important imaging method in cardiac ablation procedures. In pulmonary vein (PV) isolation procedures, MRA has the potential to minimize the risk of severe complications, such as atrio-esophageal fistula, by providing detailed information on esophageal position relatively to cardiac structures. However, traditional non-gated, first-pass (FP) MRA approaches have several limitations, such as long breath-holds, non-uniform signal intensity throughout the left atrium (LA), and poor esophageal visualization. The aim of this observational study was to validate a respiratory-navigated, ECG-gated (EC), saturation recovery-prepared MRA technique for simultaneous imaging of LA, LA appendage, PVs, esophagus, and adjacent anatomical structures. METHODS: Before PVI, 106 consecutive patients with a history of AF underwent either conventional FP-MRA (n = 53 patients) or our new EC-MRA (n = 53 patients). Five quality scores (QS) of LA and esophagus visibility were assessed by two experienced readers. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare QS between FP-MRA and EC-MRA groups, and linear regression was applied to assess clinical contributors to image quality. RESULTS: EC-MRA demonstrated significantly better image quality than FP-MRA in every quality category. Esophageal visibility using the new MRA technique was markedly better than with the conventional FP-MRA technique (median 3.5 [IQR 1] vs median 1.0, p < 0.001). In contrast to FP-MRA, overall image quality of EC-MRA was not influenced by heart rate. CONCLUSION: Our ECG-gated, respiratory-navigated, saturation recovery-prepared MRA technique provides significantly better image quality and esophageal visibility than the established non-gated, breath-holding FP-MRA. Image quality of EC-MRA technique has the additional advantage of being unaffected by heart rate. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Detailed information of cardiac anatomy has the potential to minimize the risk of severe complications and improve success rates in invasive electrophysiological studies. Our novel ECG-gated, respiratory-navigated, saturation recovery-prepared MRA technique provides significantly better image quality of LA and esophageal structures than the traditional first-pass algorithm. This new MRA technique is robust to arrhythmia (tachycardic, irregular heart rates) frequently observed in AF patients.
Authors: Julia H Indik; J Rod Gimbel; Haruhiko Abe; Ricardo Alkmim-Teixeira; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green; Geoffrey D Clarke; Timm-Michael L Dickfeld; Jerry W Froelich; Jonathan Grant; David L Hayes; Hein Heidbuchel; Salim F Idriss; Emanuel Kanal; Rachel Lampert; Christian E Machado; John M Mandrola; Saman Nazarian; Kristen K Patton; Marc A Rozner; Robert J Russo; Win-Kuang Shen; Jerold S Shinbane; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Atul Verma; Bruce L Wilkoff; Pamela K Woodard Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Michelle Fitts; Elodie Breton; Eugene G Kholmovski; Derek J Dosdall; Sathya Vijayakumar; Kyung P Hong; Ravi Ranjan; Nassir F Marrouche; Leon Axel; Daniel Kim Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Moritz Wagner; Matthias Rief; Patrick Asbach; Thomas Vogtmann; Alexander Huppertz; Mark Beling; Craig Butler; Michael Laule; Carsten Warmuth; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Hamm; Alexander Lembcke Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Aakriti Gupta; Tharani Perera; Anand Ganesan; Thomas Sullivan; Dennis H Lau; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Anthony G Brooks; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-11-15
Authors: John D Groarke; Alfonso H Waller; Tomas S Vita; Gregory F Michaud; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Michael Steigner Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 5.364