Literature DB >> 19463471

Local determinants of thrombus formation following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Hiromasa Otake1, Junya Shite, Junya Ako, Toshiro Shinke, Yusuke Tanino, Daisuke Ogasawara, Takahiro Sawada, Naoki Miyoshi, Hiroki Kato, Bon-Kwon Koo, Yasuhiro Honda, Peter J Fitzgerald, Ken-ichi Hirata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to assess the prevalence and determinants of subclinical thrombus after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation.
BACKGROUND: Angioscopic analyses have demonstrated the presence of thrombus is more common than the clinical incidence of SES thrombosis.
METHODS: Fifty-three patients (53 lesions) underwent 6-month follow-up optical coherence tomography. A stent eccentricity index ([SEI] minimum/maximum stent diameter) was determined in each cross section. To evaluate unevenness of neointimal thickness, a neointimal unevenness score ([NUS] maximum neointimal thickness in the cross section/average neointimal thickness of the same cross section) was calculated for each cross section. Average SEI and NUS were calculated for each stent. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization.
RESULTS: Fourteen cases of thrombus (26%) were detected by optical coherence tomography (thrombus: n = 14 vs. nonthrombus: n = 39). The percentage of thrombus was associated with longer stents (36.4 +/- 20.2 mm vs. 25.1 +/- 9.8 mm; p = 0.008), a larger number of uncovered struts (17 +/- 16 vs. 8 +/- 11; p = 0.03), smaller average SEI (0.89 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.92 +/- 0.03; p = 0.001), and greater average NUS (2.22 +/- 0.24 vs. 2.00 +/- 0.33; p = 0.03). A significant relationship existed between average SEI and average NUS (p < 0.0001, R = 0.68), and between average SEI and the number of uncovered struts (p < 0.0006, R = 0.46). There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events during follow-up (median: 485 days, 7.1% vs. 12.8%; p > 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Longer stents and greater asymmetric stent expansion may be important determinants of thrombus formation after SES implantation. In this small cohort, the presence of thrombus did not increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19463471     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  27 in total

1.  Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided adjuvant high-pressure non-compliant balloon post-dilation after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Muraoka; Shinjo Sonoda; Yuki Tsuda; Seiya Tanaka; Masahiro Okazaki; Yutaka Otsuji
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Effect of strut distribution on neointimal coverage of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds: an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Takao Sato; John Jose; Abdelhakim Allai; Mohamed El-Mawardy; Ralph Tölg; Gert Richardt; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ohtani; Shigeki Kimura; Tomoyo Sugiyama; Keiichi Hishikari; Toru Misawa; Masafumi Mizusawa; Kazuto Hayasaka; Yosuke Yamakami; Keisuke Kojima; Yuichiro Sagawa; Hiroyuki Hikita; Takashi Ashikaga; Atsushi Takahashi; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Lower on-treatment platelet reactivity during everolimus-eluting stent implantation contributes to the resolution of post-procedural intra-stent thrombus: serial OCT observation in the PRASFIT-Elective study.

Authors:  Akihide Konishi; Masamichi Iwasaki; Toshiro Shinke; Hiromasa Otake; Masayuki Nakagawa; Hirotoshi Hariki; Tsuyoshi Osue; Takumi Inoue; Yu Taniguchi; Ryo Nishio; Hiroto Kinutani; Noritoshi Hiranuma; Masaru Kuroda; Ken-Ichi Hirata; Shigeru Saito; Masato Nakamura; Junya Shite; Takashi Akasaka
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Side branch healing patterns of the Tryton dedicated bifurcation stent: a 1-year optical coherence tomography follow-up study.

Authors:  Maik J Grundeken; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Robin P Kraak; P Woudstra; Daniel M de Bruin; Ton G van Leeuwen; Karel T Koch; Jan G Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter; Joanna J Wykrzykowska
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  A comparison of tissue prolapse with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Jihyun Sohn; Seung-Ho Hur; In-Cheol Kim; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Hyung-Seob Park; Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Chang-Wook Nam; Yoon-Nyun Kim; Kwon-Bae Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Final kissing balloon inflation for coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single-stent technique : A meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Liu; X Ke; Z-B Huang; L-C Wang; Z-N Huang; Y Guo; M Long; X-X Liao
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Methods to assess bioresorbable vascular scaffold devices behaviour after implantation.

Authors:  Alberto Pernigotti; Elisabetta Moscarella; Giosafat Spitaleri; Claudia Scardino; Kohki Ishida; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  The Proximal Optimisation Technique for Intervention of Coronary Bifurcations.

Authors:  Angela Hoye
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

10.  Comparisons of the effects of stent eccentricity on the neointimal hyperplasia between sirolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent.

Authors:  Byeong-Keuk Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Seungjin Oh; Jung-Sun Kim; Woong Chol Kang; Dong Woon Jeon; Joo Young Yang; Donghoon Choi; Myeong-Ki Hong; Taehoon Ahn; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.