| Literature DB >> 28894602 |
Alberto Pernigotti1, Elisabetta Moscarella1, Giosafat Spitaleri1, Claudia Scardino1, Kohki Ishida1, Salvatore Brugaletta1.
Abstract
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel approach for coronary revascularization offering several advantages as compared to current generation DES, potentially reducing rate of late adverse events and avoiding permanent vessel caging. Nevertheless, safety concerns have been raised for an increased risk of scaffold thrombosis (ScT) in both early and late phases, probably related to a suboptimal scaffold implantation. In this context, the use of different imaging methodologies has been strongly suggested in order to guarantee an optimal implantation. We herein analyze the different imaging methodologies available to assess BRS after implantation and at follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Scaffold; echogenicity; intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); multislice coronary tomography (MSCT); optical coherence tomography (OCT); virtual histology-IVUS (VH-IVUS)
Year: 2017 PMID: 28894602 PMCID: PMC5583089 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895