Literature DB >> 28894602

Methods to assess bioresorbable vascular scaffold devices behaviour after implantation.

Alberto Pernigotti1, Elisabetta Moscarella1, Giosafat Spitaleri1, Claudia Scardino1, Kohki Ishida1, Salvatore Brugaletta1.   

Abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel approach for coronary revascularization offering several advantages as compared to current generation DES, potentially reducing rate of late adverse events and avoiding permanent vessel caging. Nevertheless, safety concerns have been raised for an increased risk of scaffold thrombosis (ScT) in both early and late phases, probably related to a suboptimal scaffold implantation. In this context, the use of different imaging methodologies has been strongly suggested in order to guarantee an optimal implantation. We herein analyze the different imaging methodologies available to assess BRS after implantation and at follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scaffold; echogenicity; intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); multislice coronary tomography (MSCT); optical coherence tomography (OCT); virtual histology-IVUS (VH-IVUS)

Year:  2017        PMID: 28894602      PMCID: PMC5583089          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  49 in total

Review 1.  Design principles and performance of bioresorbable polymeric vascular scaffolds.

Authors:  James P Oberhauser; Syed Hossainy; Richard J Rapoza
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.534

2.  A comparison of the conformability of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds to metal platform coronary stents.

Authors:  Josep Gomez-Lara; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Yoshinobu Onuma; Scot Garg; Evelyn Regar; Bernard De Bruyne; Stefan Windecker; Dougal McClean; Leif Thuesen; Dariusz Dudek; Jacques Koolen; Robert Whitbourn; Pieter C Smits; Bernard Chevalier; Cécile Dorange; Susan Veldhof; Marie-Angèle Morel; Ton de Vries; John A Ormiston; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; John A Ormiston; Yoshinobu Onuma; Evelyn Regar; Nieves Gonzalo; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Koen Nieman; Nico Bruining; Cécile Dorange; Karine Miquel-Hébert; Susan Veldhof; Mark Webster; Leif Thuesen; Dariusz Dudek
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  First magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging of bioresorbable vascular scaffold in-patient.

Authors:  Gilles Barone-Rochette; Estelle Vautrin; Mathieu Rodière; Alexis Broisat; Gérald Vanzetto
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: potential approach for noninvasive evaluation of coronary patency.

Authors:  Simon Reiss; Axel J Krafft; Manfred Zehender; Timo Heidt; Thomas Pfannebecker; Christoph Bode; Michael Bock; Constantin von Zur Muhlen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  Absorb vs. DESolve: an optical coherence tomography comparison of acute mechanical performances.

Authors:  Alessio Mattesini; Niklas Boeder; Serafina Valente; Katja Löblich; Oliver Dörr; Gioel G Secco; Nicolas Foin; Gianluca Caiazzo; Matteo Ghione; Gian Franco Gensini; Italo Porto; Carlo Di Mario; Holger Nef
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.534

7.  Predilation, sizing and post-dilation scoring in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for prediction of cardiac adverse events: development and internal validation of the PSP score.

Authors:  Luis Ortega-Paz; Davide Capodanno; Tommaso Gori; Holger Nef; Azeem Latib; Giuseppe Caramanno; Carlo Di Mario; Christoph Naber; Maciej Lesiak; Piera Capranzano; Jens Wiebe; Julinda Mehilli; Aleksander Araszkiewicz; Stelios Pyxaras; Alessio Mattesini; Salvatore Geraci; Toru Naganuma; Antonio Colombo; Thomas Münzel; Manel Sabaté; Corrado Tamburino; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 8.  Follow-up of coronary artery patency after implantation of bioresorbable coronary scaffolds: The emerging role of magnetic coronary artery imaging.

Authors:  Marco Zuin; Gianluca Rigatelli; Fiorenzo Scaranello; Massimo Rinuncini; Claudio Picariello; Katia D'Elia; Majlinda Fejzo; Loris Roncon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2017-02-07

9.  Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial.

Authors:  Shinjo Sonoda; Yoshihiro Morino; Junya Ako; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Ali H M Hassan; Heidi N Bonneau; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey W Moses; Paul G Yock; Yasuhiro Honda; Richard E Kuntz; Peter J Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.

Authors:  Stefan Verheye; John A Ormiston; James Stewart; Mark Webster; Elias Sanidas; Ricardo Costa; J Ribamar Costa; Daniel Chamie; Andrea S Abizaid; Ibraim Pinto; Lynn Morrison; Sara Toyloy; Vinayak Bhat; John Yan; Alexandre Abizaid
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 11.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.