Literature DB >> 19462251

"Fit-for-purpose" method validation and application of a biomarker (C-terminal telopeptides of type 1 collagen) in denosumab clinical studies.

Jin Wang1, Jean Lee, Daniel Burns, David Doherty, Laura Brunner, Mark Peterson, Binodh DeSilva.   

Abstract

Biomarkers are used to study drug effects, exposure-response relationships, and facilitate early decision making during development. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, profoundly inhibits bone resorption. C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTx), a bone resorption biomarker, provides early indications of denosumab effectiveness and informs protracted clinical outcomes (e.g., bone mineral density). Because of the dynamic relationship between denosumab and CTx, a precise and robust assay was desired. Thus, we adopted a fit-for-purpose approach to modify and validate a commercial CTx diagnostic kit to meet the intended applications of a quantitative pharmacodynamic biomarker for denosumab development. Seven standards were prepared to replace five calibrators provided in the kit. Three quality controls (QC) and two sample controls were used to characterize and monitor assay performance. Robotic workstations were used for standard and QC preparation and assay execution. Method validation experiments were conducted with rigor and procedures similar to those used for drug bioanalysis. The method demonstrated a linear range of 0.0490-2.34 ng/mL with four-parameter logistic regression. Inter-assay total error of validation samples in serum was < or = 26.7%. Extensive tests were conducted on selectivity in sera from target populations, specificity, stability, parallelism, and dilutional linearity. Applications to samples from numerous clinical studies confirmed that the CTx method was reliable, robust, and fit for use as an early indicator of denosumab effectiveness. Refinement supported the confidence for use in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, dose selections, correlation to clinical effects, and formulation bioequivalence work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19462251      PMCID: PMC2691475          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-009-9115-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  13 in total

1.  Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  J W Findlay; W C Smith; J W Lee; G D Nordblom; I Das; B S DeSilva; M N Khan; R R Bowsher
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 2.  Markers of bone turnover for monitoring treatment of osteoporosis with antiresorptive drugs.

Authors:  P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Recommendations for the bioanalytical method validation of ligand-binding assays to support pharmacokinetic assessments of macromolecules.

Authors:  Binodh DeSilva; Wendell Smith; Russell Weiner; Marian Kelley; JoMarie Smolec; Ben Lee; Masood Khan; Richard Tacey; Howard Hill; Abbie Celniker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  Wayne A Colburn; Jean W Lee
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Viswanath Devanarayan; Yu Chen Barrett; Russell Weiner; John Allinson; Scott Fountain; Stephen Keller; Ira Weinryb; Marie Green; Larry Duan; James A Rogers; Robert Millham; Peter J O'Brien; Jeff Sailstad; Masood Khan; Chad Ray; John A Wagner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Specificity and selectivity evaluations of ligand binding assay of protein therapeutics against concomitant drugs and related endogenous proteins.

Authors:  Jean Lee; Hongjin Ma
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Method validation of protein biomarkers in support of drug development or clinical diagnosis/prognosis.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Michael Hall
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Serum CrossLaps for monitoring the response in individuals undergoing antiresorptive therapy.

Authors:  S Christgau; O Bitsch-Jensen; N Hanover Bjarnason; E Gamwell Henriksen; P Qvist; P Alexandersen; D Bang Henriksen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  A single-dose placebo-controlled study of AMG 162, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Pirow J Bekker; Donna L Holloway; Amy S Rasmussen; Robyn Murphy; Steven W Martin; Philip T Leese; Gregory B Holmes; Colin R Dunstan; Alex M DePaoli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  9 in total

1.  Calculations for Adjusting Endogenous Biomarker Levels During Analytical Recovery Assessments for Ligand-Binding Assay Bioanalytical Method Validation.

Authors:  John F Marcelletti; Cindy L Evans; Manju Saxena; Adriana E Lopez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Validation of a ligand binding assay using dried blood spot sampling.

Authors:  Daniel Burns; Laura Brunner; Surendran Rajendran; Beth Johnson; Mark Ma; Jin Wang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Recommendations for Selection and Characterization of Protein Biomarker Assay Calibrator Material.

Authors:  Kyra J Cowan; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Mark J Cameron; Damien Fink; Darshana Jani; Medha Kamat; Lindsay King; Robert J Neely; Yan Ni; Paul Rhyne; Renee Riffon; Yuda Zhu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Nutritional approach for inhibiting bone resorption in institutionalized elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency and high prevalence of fracture.

Authors:  J-P Bonjour; V Benoit; O Pourchaire; B Rousseau; J-C Souberbielle
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Quantitative hydrophilic interaction chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of N-acetylneuraminic acid and N-acetylmannosamine in human plasma.

Authors:  Yifan Shi; Xin Xu; Meng Fang; Michael Zhang; Yinghe Li; Brad Gillespie; Selwyn Yorke; Nora Yang; John C McKew; William A Gahl; Marjan Huizing; Nuria Carrillo-Carrasco; Amy Qiu Wang
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  COPD association and repeatability of blood biomarkers in the ECLIPSE cohort.

Authors:  Jennifer A Dickens; Bruce E Miller; Lisa D Edwards; Edwin K Silverman; David A Lomas; Ruth Tal-Singer
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2011-11-04

7.  Long-term treatment of osteoporosis: safety and efficacy appraisal of denosumab.

Authors:  Athanasios D Anastasilakis; Konstantinos A Toulis; Stergios A Polyzos; Chrysostomos D Anastasilakis; Polyzois Makras
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Quantitation of cytidine-5'-monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid in human leukocytes using LC-MS/MS: method development and validation.

Authors:  Meng Fang; Xin Xu; Michael Zhang; Yifan Shi; Guodong Gu; Wanjing Liu; Bradley Class; Carla Ciccone; William A Gahl; Marjan Huizing; Nuria Carrillo; Amy Q Wang
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 1.911

9.  Characterization of a quantitative method to measure free proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 in human serum.

Authors:  Alexander Colbert; Amber Umble-Romero; Samantha Prokop; Ren Xu; John Gibbs; Susan Pederson
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.857

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.